Search for: ""Geier v. American Honda Motor Co." OR "529 U.S. 861"" Results 1 - 20 of 35
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2016, 8:01 am by Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers
American Honda Motor Co., 529 U.S. 861; 98-1811 (2000) 2000 Category: Personal injury; preemption Continue Reading [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 8:01 am by Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers
American Honda Motor Co., 529 U.S. 861; 98-1811 (2000) 2000 Category: Personal injury; preemption Continue Reading [read post]
25 May 2010, 4:58 am by Bexis
American Honda Motor Co., 529 U.S. 861 (2000), a 5-4 case concerning preemption of "no-airbag" claims, and more generally implied preemption, in the wake of the Levine case.The Court also invited the SG to "express the view of the United States" in the Mensing case (Supreme Court Nos. 09-993, 09-1039. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 9:20 am by Bexis
American Honda Motor Co., 529 U.S. 861 (2000), the first major implied preemption decision in the product liability field, might be overruled. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 11:46 am by Bexis
American Honda Motor Co., 529 U.S. 861 (2000), and Freightliner Corp. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 6:04 am
American Honda Motor Co., 529 U.S. 861 (2000), the Department of Transportation thought that "no-airbag" claims should be preempted; the Supreme Court held that they were.In Sprietsma v. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 5:54 am
American Honda Motor Co., 529 U.S. 861, 873 (2000).Preemption is not limited to displacing state statutes. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 4:30 am by Nick Farr
American Honda Motor Co., 529 U.S. 861 (2000) (holding that Section 208 of the FMVSS preempted a state tort suit against a auto manufacturer for failure to install airbags). [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 12:12 pm by Beck, et al.
American Honda Motor Co., 529 U.S. 861 (2000), hadn't rippled that far yet, and 2001 was the year that Buckman Co. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 11:16 pm
American Honda Motor Co., 529 U.S. 861 (2000), as involving "formal rulemaking and then. . .a plan to phase in a mix of [options]. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 5:00 am
American Honda Motor Co., 529 U.S. 861 (2000). [read post]
21 May 2015, 1:09 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
American Honda Motor Co., 529 U.S. 861 (2000), which held that an “action was barred because it directly conflicted with the agency’s policy choice to encourage flexibility to foster innovation. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 12:27 pm by Don Cruse
American Honda Motor Co., 529 U.S. 861, 868 (2000), which had found preemption in the context of air bags. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 10:10 pm
American Honda Motor Co., 529 U.S. 861 (2000), in which the Supreme Court held that a plaintiff's claim against an auto manufacturer was subject to conflict preemption because allowing a state law claim would preclude the types of choice in safety restraints that the federal agency had allowed manufacturers. [read post]