Search for: ""Lorillard v. Pons" OR "434 U.S. 575"" Results 1 - 6 of 6
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2012, 4:04 pm
The court said that it found nothing in the Basic Authorities Act, 22 U.S.C. 2669(c)2(c), relied upon by the State Department for its action that abrogated the ADEA’s broad proscription against personnel actions that discriminate on the basis of age.*** Noting that the Supreme Court has recognized that the ADEA’s sweeping mandate “broadly prohibits arbitrary discrimination in the workplace based on age,” citing Lorillard v Pons, 434… [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 8:51 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Pons, 434 U.S. 575, 581 (1978) (“[W]here . . . [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 2:48 pm by Daniel M. Kowalski
Pons , 434 U.S. 575, 580 (1978), Congress is presumed to be aware of an administrative interpretation of a statute and to adopt that interpretation when it reenacts its statutes without change. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 11:33 am
Pons, 434 U.S. 575, 580 (1978)). [read post]