Search for: ""Mapp v. Ohio" OR "367 U.S. 643"" Results 1 - 20 of 37
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2010, 3:54 am by Thomas Withers
Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961), which applied the exclusionary rule to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 11:57 am by Lucie Olejnikova
Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961), the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable search and seizure case, and Texas v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 4:45 am
Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 81 S.Ct. 1684, 6 L.Ed.2d 1081 (1961), mandates the exclusion of evidence obtained in violation of constitutional rights. [read post]
10 Aug 2008, 3:30 pm
Ohio (1961), 367 U.S. 643: "There are those who say, as did Justice (then Judge) Cardozo, that under our constitutional exclusionary doctrine '[t]he criminal is to go free because the constable has blundered.' People v. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 5:45 pm by Theodore Harvatin
Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961)) This will often times leave the prosecutor without sufficient evidence to prove its case, resulting in dismissal of the charges. [read post]
16 Nov 2008, 11:04 am by Bruce M. Robinson
Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961), says that citizens shall not be stopped in their cars, or otherwise without probable cause or reasonable suspicion to believe that a crime has been committed. [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 2:05 pm
Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 81 S.Ct. 1684, 6 L.Ed.2d 1081 (1961), by application of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 9:46 am by The Charge
Salvucci, 448 U.S. 83 (1980) (a case reaching the Court from Massachusetts) and created a state law rule of automatic standing for all possessory offenses in Commonwealth v. [read post]