Search for: ""Marks v. United States" OR "430 U.S. 188"" Results 1 - 20 of 25
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2023, 4:05 pm by Lawrence Solum
United States, 430 U.S. 188 (1977), a series of potential reforms are proposed. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 8:54 am by Josh Blackman
United States, 430 U.S. 188, 193 (1977) (explaining that when "no single rationale explaining the result [of a case] enjoys the assent of five Justices, 'the holding of the Court may be viewed as that position taken by those Members who concurred in the judgments on the narrowest grounds'" (quoting Gregg v. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 12:24 pm
United States, 430 U.S. 188, 193 (1977).Assuming that Marks also governs the way CAAF opinions should be construed--as at least one CAAF judge has assumed, see United States v. [read post]
13 May 2009, 8:56 am
United States, 430 U.S. 188, 193 (U.S. 1977). [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 8:20 am by David Post
United States, 430 U.S. 188 (1977): Chief Justice Robert's vote was necessary in holding unconstitutional Louisiana's admitting-privileges law, so his separate opinion is controlling. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
United States, 430 U.S. 188, 193 (1977) – that the controlling “holding of the court may be viewed as that position taken by those members who concurred on the narrowest grounds. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 3:18 pm by Don Cruse
United States, 430 U.S. 188 (1977)4 Notably, the Texas courts have not adopted the Marks reasoning as a way to resolve splits on the Texas Supreme Court. [read post]