Search for: ""Mitchell v. King Packing Co." OR "350 U.S. 260"" Results 1 - 4 of 4
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Employers Do Not Have to Pay Employees for the Time Spent in a Security Screening After Work, Says the U.S. Supreme Court.
15 Dec 2014, 7:53 am by Leiza Dolghih
King Packing Co. [read post]
North Texas Legal News - http://northtexaslegalnews.com/
U.S.S.C.: Time Spent By Employees Waiting For and Undergoing Security Screenings Before Leaving Workplace Was Not Compensable Under FLSA
11 Jan 2015, 8:39 am by Andrew Frisch
King Packing Co., 350 U.S. 260, 262, 76 S.Ct. 337, 100 L.Ed. 282—and Department of Labor regulations are consistent with this approach, see 29 CFR §§ 790.8(c), 790.7(g). [read post]
Overtime Law Blog - http://flsaovertimelaw.com/
Are COVID-19 Temperature Screenings Compensable Time for Non-Exempt Employees? Continue Reading…
10 Jun 2020, 8:50 am by <a href='http://www.ebglaw.com/showbio.aspx?Show=2371'>Michael S. Kun</a>, <a href='http://www.ebglaw.com/jeffrey-h-ruzal/'>Jeffrey H. Ruzal</a> and <a href='https://www.ebglaw.com/carly-baratt/'>Carly Baratt</a>
King Packing Co. [read post]
Wage & Hour Defense Blog - http://www.wagehourblog.com/
6th Cir.: Although Changing Into PPE At Food-Processing Plant Is “Changing Clothes” and Excluded Under 203(o), It Is A Principle Activity And Begins The “Continuous Workday”
3 Sep 2010, 4:07 am by Andrew Frisch
Mitchell, 350 U.S. 247, 256 (1956). 1. [read post]
Overtime Law Blog | FLSA Decisions - http://overtimelaw.wordpress.com