Search for: ""Ohio v. Robinette" OR "519 U.S. 33"" Results 1 - 18 of 18
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2010, 4:41 am
Robinette, 519 U.S. 33, 35 (1996) (holding that a lawfully seized individual need not be informed that he or she is free to go for a consent to search to be recognized as voluntary). [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 10:49 am by utahdefenders
Robinette, 519 U.S. 33, 39–40, 117 S.Ct. 417, 136 L.Ed.2d 347 (1996) (citing Schneckloth v. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 8:16 pm by Jerry Salcido
Robinette519 U.S. 33, 39 (1996), and the burden is on the State to prove the reasonableness of the officer’s actions. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 8:16 pm by Jerry Salcido
Robinette519 U.S. 33, 39 (1996), and the burden is on the State to prove the reasonableness of the officer’s actions. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 8:30 am by MBettman
Robinette, 519 U.S. 33 (1996), (Robinette II) finding that even though the Supreme Court of Ohio had said it was relying on its own constitution, all the analysis in the case was based on federal law. [read post]