Search for: ""Samson v. California" OR "547 U.S. 843""
Results 1 - 20
of 24
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2011, 7:36 am
California, 547 U.S. 843 (2006). [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 12:47 pm
California, 547 U.S. 843 (2006), which tied the parameters of a search of a state parolee to the consent required of as a condition of parole. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 3:51 am
California, 547 U.S. 843 (2006). [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 8:23 pm
California, 547 U.S. 843, 848 (2006). [read post]
21 Sep 2008, 7:59 am
California, 547 U.S. 843, 850, 126 S. [read post]
23 Mar 2013, 4:11 pm
California, 547 U.S. 843 (2006). [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 2:54 pm
California, 547 U.S. 843, 850 (2006). [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 5:07 am
California, 547 U.S. 843, 850, 126 S. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 5:50 am
California, 547 U.S. 843, 846, 848, 126 S. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 10:59 am
California, 547 U.S. 843, 850 (2006), the United States Supreme Court held that: [P]arolees are on the "continuum" of state-imposed punishments. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 12:02 pm
California, 547 U.S. 843, 854-55, 126 S. [read post]
17 May 2018, 10:03 pm
California, 547 U.S. 843 (2006) (parolees). [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 7:05 am
See Samson v. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 3:21 pm
California, 547 U.S. 843 (2006) (upholding a suspicionless warrantless search of a parolee); United States v. [read post]
22 May 2008, 7:32 am
California, 547 U.S. 843 (2006), the Sixth found that officer's warrantless search of the defendant's home did not violate the Fourth Amendment because "Smith had little, if indeed any, reasonable expectation of privacy in being free from a suspicionless search of his residence. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 1:13 pm
California, 547 U.S. 843 (2006). [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 1:13 pm
California, 547 U.S. 843 (2006). [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 3:21 pm
California, 547 U.S. 843 (2006) (upholding a suspicionless warrantless search of a parolee); United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 10:28 am
Samson v. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 9:34 am
California, 547 U.S. 843, 846 (2006), the United States Supreme Court considered whether suspicionless searches of parolees violated the Fourth Amendment. [read post]