Search for: ""Smith v. City of Jackson" OR "544 U.S. 228"" Results 1 - 12 of 12
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2008, 6:26 am
City of Jackson 544 U.S. 228 which held that recovery is available under the ADEA not only for disparate treatment or intentional discrimination but also unintentional claims or disparate treatment. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 9:02 pm
City of Jackson, 544 U.S. 228 (2005), recognizing that employees can bring disparate impact claims for age discrimination under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) (claims based on evidence that older workers are disproportionately affected by an employment decision, even if the decision was not taken because of the employees' age). [read post]
9 May 2007, 2:08 pm
City of Jackson, Miss., 544 U.S. 228 (2005), but also provides that it "shall not be unlawful for an employer . . . to take any action otherwise prohibited . . . where the differentiation is based on reasonable factors other than age. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 6:53 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
City of Jackson, 544 U.S. 228 (2005), a group of older police officers brought suit alleging that the City violated the ADEA when it adopted a pay plan that provided them less-generous salary increases than younger officers. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 6:09 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
City of Jackson, 544 U.S. 228 (2005), the Court confirmed that an employer can defend against such a claim by showing that the challenged decision was based on a reasonable factor other than age (“RFOA”). [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 7:18 am by John Holmquist
City of Jackson, 544 U.S. 228 (2005), Commission regulations interpreted the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) to require employers to prove that actions with an age-based disparate impact were justified as job related and consistent with business necessity. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 3:52 am by SHG
City of Jackson, 544 U.S. 228 (2005). [read post]