Search for: ""United States v. Booker" OR "543 U.S. 220""
Results 1 - 20
of 107
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2008, 8:57 pm
The United States Supreme Court decision of United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 9:29 pm
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), it... [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 6:24 pm
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). [read post]
20 Oct 2006, 9:43 am
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 10:20 am
Booker,543 U.S. 220 (2005) , on June 12, 2005. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 11:40 am
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 4:22 am
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 6:25 am
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), and United States v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 12:41 pm
Booker, 543 U.S. at 258-60. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 7:49 am
In United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2006, 12:26 pm
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), to accord a presumption of reasonableness to within-Guidelines sentences? [read post]
9 Nov 2006, 12:38 pm
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 4:48 am
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), a sentencing court is still under no obligation to give notice before imposing a sentence in excess of the Chapter 7 sentence range.Read the opinion here. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 5:27 am
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), provided the opportunity for a wholesale re-examination of the federal sentencing scheme that had held judges, defendants and practitioners alike in thrall for some 17 years. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 1:06 am
Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 246 (2005)(collecting cases). [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 11:38 am
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). [read post]
2 Jan 2007, 7:19 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 11:00 am
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), a district court abuses its discretion by declining to consider the disparity between a recommended Guidelines sentence and the maximum sentence a defendant would receive if convicted of the same conduct in state court. [read post]
4 Nov 2006, 8:07 pm
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), to accord a presumption of reasonableness to within-Guidelines sentences? [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 9:07 am
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), that facts relevant to the advisory United States Sentencing Guidelines need not be submitted to a jury. [read post]