Search for: ""United States v. Cotton" OR "535 U.S. 625""
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2004, 11:19 am
Cotton, 535 U.S. 625, 631 (2002) (holding that an Apprendi violation can be considered under plain error analysis); United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 9:30 am
Cotton, 535 U.S. 625, 631-32 (2002); United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 8:23 am
Cotton, 535 U.S. 625 (2002). [read post]
29 Sep 2004, 12:28 pm
Cotton, 535 U.S. 625, 632 (2002) (in a review of an Apprendi error, holding that the "third inquiry usually means that the error must have affected the outcome of the district court's proceedings"). [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 3:03 pm
Cotton, 535 U.S. 625, 630 (2002)). [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:00 am
Cotton, 535 U.S. 625, found that a defective indictment does not deprive a court of jurisdiction. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 11:48 am
Cotton, 535 U.S. 625 (2002), a view now that the Court said is now shared by a majority of state courts, see, e.g., State v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 6:03 am
Cotton, 535 U.S. 625 (2002), and most states have also done so. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 11:54 am
Cotton, 535 U.S. 625 (2002), wherein the United States Supreme Court overruled “the common law principle” that a defective indictment deprives a court of jurisdiction. [read post]
