Search for: ""United States v. Robinson" OR "414 U.S. 218""
Results 1 - 20
of 22
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2009, 5:29 am
Pursuant to the Supreme Court's opinion in United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 12:16 pm
Robinson 414 U.S. 218 (1973). [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 11:26 am
Question certified: DOES THE HOLDING IN UNITED STATES V. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 9:03 pm
ROBINSON, 414 U.S. 218, 94 S. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 6:11 am
Robinson, 414 U.S. 218, 224 (1973). [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 12:05 pm
Robinson, 414 U.S. 218, 235 (1973). [read post]
18 Aug 2013, 4:03 pm
Robinson, 414 U.S. 218 (1973). [read post]
3 May 2013, 3:29 pm
Robinson, 414 U.S. 218 (1973), in which the United States Supreme Court held that the search-incident-to-arrest warrant exception permits a search and inspection of the contents of personal items found on the arrestee, even if it is unlikely that the arrestee has a weapon or evidence related to the crime on his person." [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 7:01 am
Robinson, 414 U.S. 218, 235, 94 S. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 2:14 pm
Robinson, 414 U.S. 218, 235, 94 S.Ct. 467, 38 L.Ed.2d 427 (1973). [read post]
28 Nov 2006, 9:00 pm
Robinson, 414 U.S. 218, 236, and n. 7 (1973) (officer's subjective fear not determinative of necessity for 'search incident to arrest' exception to the Fourth Amendment warrant requirement). [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 6:08 am
Robinson, 414 U.S. 218, 235 (1973)). [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 1:00 pm
Edwards, 415 U.S. 800, 802-803 (1974) and United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 11:58 am
The court relied on United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 2:23 pm
Robinson, 414 U.S. 218. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 10:14 am
Robinson (1973), 414 U.S. 218, 94 S.Ct. 467, 38 L.Ed.2d 427. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 12:58 pm
The court relied on United States v. [read post]
31 May 2007, 11:16 am
Robinson, 414 U.S. 218 (1973). [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 8:42 am
Robinson, 414 U.S. 218, 235 (1973). [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 6:23 am
Robinson, 414 U.S. 218, 221 & n.1 (1973) (traffic violation arrest not rendered invalid by fact that it was "a mere pretext for a narcotics search"); United States v. [read post]
