Search for: ""United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez" OR "494 U.S. 259"" Results 1 - 18 of 18
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2009, 9:54 pm
Verdugo-Urquidez, 494 U.S. 259 (1990), the Supreme Court held that the Fourth Amendment does not apply to the search and seizure by United States agents of property that is owned by a nonresident alien and located in a foreign country. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 11:36 am
Verdugo-Urquidez, 494 U.S. 259, 267 (1990), the First quotes that "There is . . . no indication that the Fourth Amendment was understood by contemporaries of the Framers to apply to activities of the United States directed against aliens in foreign territory or in international waters. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 1:51 pm by Orin Kerr
Verdugo-Urquidez, 494 U.S. 259, 274–75 (1990)); see also Verdugo-Urquidez, 494 U.S. at 274–75 (“At the time of the search, [respondent] was a citizen and resident of Mexico with no voluntary attachment to the United States, and the place searched was located in Mexico. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 5:40 am by David Post
  Judges could then issue orders to any U.S. [read post]