Search for: ""Watts v. Indiana" OR "338 U.S. 49"" Results 1 - 6 of 6
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2015, 1:25 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Indiana, 338 U.S. 49, 59 (1949) (opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part). [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 3:26 pm by Rob McKinney
Indiana, 338 U.S. 49, 59 (1949), Supreme Court Justice Robert H. [read post]
5 May 2010, 10:25 am by Steve Bainbridge
Indiana, 338 U.S. 49, 54 (1949).Personally, I think the Anglo-American traditions of liberty are one of the things conservatives ought to be in favor of conserving. [read post]
22 Sep 2007, 2:18 pm
  Indeed, the court was itself dismayed, beginning its opinion with a quote from Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter (from Watts v. [read post]