Search for: "A v. City of Milwaukee et al"
Results 1 - 16
of 16
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2010, 9:08 am
He filed a petition for writ of mandamus against the City, the Milwaukee Municipal Court, the Milwaukee Municipal Court Clerk, the Milwaukee City Attorney and the Milwaukee Department of Public Works, seeking an order compelling [...] [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 2:39 pm
., et al. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 1:00 pm
., et al., Petitioners v. [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 3:20 pm
Desmond et al. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 12:09 pm
Kroeger, et al. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 9:25 am
Kroeger, et al. [read post]
31 Dec 2007, 1:36 pm
Milwaukee, 171 Wis. 514 (1920), milk dealers claimed that a Milwaukee ordinance requiring that all milk sold within the city be pasteurized would hurt their business, and that the ordinance was an invalid exercise of the police power because it did not promote the public health. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm
Kroeger, et al. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 9:49 pm
Opinion below (Revised, 5th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Title: City of Milwaukee Post No. 2874 Veterans of Foreign Wars v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 9:57 am
Gerken et al. as Amici Curiae 27 (citing Wang, Let Math Save Our Democracy, N. [read post]
23 Sep 2017, 12:39 pm
LEXIS 155132 :Plaintiffs [ MILWAUKEE ELECTRIC TOOL et al] assert infringement of the following claims against Snap-on: claims 1 and 8-10 of U.S. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 4:04 am
Powerscreen International Distribution Limited et al. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 12:07 pm
Sixth Circuit Holds Disabled Retirees Lack Standing to Bring Claims Under Disabilities ActLeroy McKnight, et al. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 2:27 pm
Williamson, et al., 1 Bankrupt. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 2:19 pm
In finding its application of Kravis proper, the Board found that the Respondent could not have relied on the due process standard overruled by Kravis as well settled when it withdrew recognition of the union, because the Supreme Court's earlier decision in NLRB v. [read post]
