Search for: "A. G.S. G." Results 1 - 20 of 166
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2014, 6:07 am by Jamie Markham
But while it was mandatory, a lot of defendants were placed on probation under G.S. 90-96(a). [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 2:24 pm by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Unpublished Opinion in the following matter: DA 09-0324, 2009 MT 429N, T.A.S. and G.S., on behalf of T.S. and N.S., Petitioners and Appellees, v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 11:20 am by Jonathan Holbrook
Unfortunately, G.S. 14-277.2 does not define the terms parade, picket line, or demonstration, and there are no appellate cases interpreting and applying this statute. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 6:29 am by Jessica Smith
G.S. 15A-1335 provides that when a conviction or sentence imposed in superior court has been set aside on direct review or collateral attack, the court may not impose a new sentence for the same offense, or for a different offense based on the same conduct, that is more severe than the prior sentence less the […] [read post]
5 May 2014, 7:47 am by Jamie Markham
Extraordinary mitigation—or, more precisely, dispositional deviation for extraordinary mitigation—under G.S. 15A-1340.13(g) is a way for the court to impose a probationary sentence for a defendant whose offense class and prior record level ordinarily require an active sentence. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 9:19 am by Jamie Markham
In 2009, the tolling law was moved from G.S. 15A-1344(d) to new G.S. 15A-1344(g), and modified to provide that if the charge that tolled a person’s probation was acquitted or dismissed, the person would receive credit for the time spent under supervision during the tolled period. [read post]
5 May 2014, 7:47 am by Jamie Markham
Extraordinary mitigation—or, more precisely, dispositional deviation for extraordinary mitigation—under G.S. 15A-1340.13(g) is a way for the court to impose a probationary sentence for a defendant whose offense class and prior record level ordinarily require an active sentence. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 9:28 am by Jacquelyn Greene
However, the prosecutor has the authority under G.S. 7B-2200.5(a1) to decline to transfer a case in which a Class D – G felony is alleged to have been committed at age 16 or 17. [read post]