Search for: "ADVANCE WIRELESS, LLC" Results 1 - 20 of 101
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2012, 8:30 am by Steven G. Pearl
Verizon Wireless, LLC (7/10/12) --- Cal.App.4th --- is the latest in a line of decisions dealing with what are called chargebacks: when employers can or can't recover from employees amounts that have been paid either as commissions or as advances on commissions. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 3:48 pm by Brian Van Vleck
Verizon Wireless, LLC the California  Court of Appeal upheld the right of an employer to reclaim or "charge back" commissions which are provisionally advanced for sales that are later canceled. [read post]
Mobilitie, LLC petitioned the FCC to issue a declaratory ruling interpreting three phrases in §253(c) of the Communications Act of 1934 to speed the deployment of advanced wireless infrastructure. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 10:00 am
Today's advance release contract law opinion: Konover Development Corp. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 12:10 pm by Alex Gasser
On March 21, 2011, Creative Kingdoms, LLC of Wakefield, Rhode Island and New Kingdoms, LLC of Nehalem, Oregon (collectively, “Proposed Complainants”) filed a complaint requesting the ITC to commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 8:38 am by Gene Quinn
., a manufacturer of advanced solid-state electricity meters, recently announced that it entered into the first licensing agreements to its wireless smart electric meter patent portfolio, consisting of U.S. [read post]
16 Apr 2022, 2:49 pm by Dennis Crouch
SRAM, LLC, 944 F.3d 1366 (Fed. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 3:03 pm by Patricia Salkin
Plaintiff-appellee T-Mobile Northeast LLC sought to operate a wireless telecommunications facility in an existing church steeple in Cape Cod. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 10:52 pm by Patricia Salkin
PI Telecom Infrastructure, LLC challenged the City Jacksonville, Florida’s denial of its application to construct a wireless communications facility (more commonly known as a cell tower) as violative of the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:20 am
Therefore Sir Terence concluded:I am satisfied in those circumstances that it would be wrong to allow this new point of interpretation to be advanced on the appeal since it would be quite wrong to permit Motorola to advance the linked and consequential attack on the Judge's findings of obviousness over PCMAIL and IMAP4.At first instance, Arnold J had actually found Claim 1 to be obvious over PCMAIL and IMAP4 (non-wireless email protocols) not only on the broad construction… [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 10:45 am by Nissenbaum Law Group
With the advent of wireless technology, there have been growing concerns about the protection of individual privacy against arbitrary intrusion by government agents. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 10:52 am by Nissenbaum Law Group
With the advent of wireless technology, there have been growing concerns about the protection of individual privacy against arbitrary intrusion by government agents. [read post]
24 May 2013, 1:50 pm by Florian Mueller
_____MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC,Appellant,v.INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION,Appellee.On Appeal from the United States International Trade Commission, Investigation No. 337-TA-745MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC'S PETITION FOR REVIEWPursuant to 28 U.S.C. $ 1295(a)(6), 19 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 4:44 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
The Business Venture Plaintiff Quattro Parent LLC (“Quattro”) was a closely-held Delaware LLC comprised of a handful of investment funds, including one affiliated with George Soros (“Soros”), which invested in a startup venture to build a wireless broadband network in São Paulo, Brazil. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 5:19 pm by David Klein
”  Rejected Arguments The ruling dismissed several arguments advanced by AATM. [read post]