Search for: "Arthur Anderson LLP"
Results 1 - 20
of 52
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2009, 7:05 am
Among the four opinions the Supreme Court handed down today was Arthur Anderson LLP v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 9:14 am
Here is the abstract: Arthur Andersen LLP v. [read post]
24 May 2009, 6:07 am
Two were argued on 24 February, one on 25 February, and one (Arthur Anderson LLP v. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 4:24 am
Causey, formerly with Arthur Anderson LLP, was a key player in the scandal that brought Enron to bankruptcy in late 2001, when Enron's use of off-the-books partnership deals, inflated profits, and billions of dollars in hidden money was disclosed.Original ComplaintPlea AgreementSEC Litigation Release [read post]
1 Sep 2006, 1:53 pm
Arthur Anderson LLP, 2006 WL 2498013, that there is no "narrow restraint exception" to California's Business and Professions Code section 16600, which prohibits most noncompetition agreements. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 10:03 pm
Arthur Anderson LLP, the California Supreme Court ruled on the following issues: (1) To what extent does Business and Professions Code section 16600 prohibit employee noncompetition agreements; and (2) is a contract provision requiring an employee to release “any and all” claims unlawful because it encompasses nonwaivable statutory protections, such as the employee indemnity protection of Labor Code section 2802? [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 4:11 pm
He worked as Senior Associate at Sanchez & Amador LLP from 2010 to 2011, Senior Associate at Anderson McPharlin & Conners LLP in 2010, and as Senior Associate at Robins Kaplan LLP from 2006 to 2009. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 12:05 pm
Arthur Andersen LLP, 44 Cal. 4th 937 (2008) and held that customer non-solicits were unenforceable, it noted that Edward’s agreement likewise contained an employee non-solicit, but since Edwards did not dispute that portion of the agreement or contend that it was unenforceable, it did not address the employee-non-solicit in its holding. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 3:20 pm
Raymond Edwards II was hired as a tax manager by Arthur Andersen LLP. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 8:40 am
United States: In Arthur Anderson LLP v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 8:00 pm
Arthur Anderson, LLP, Arthur Anderson sought to enforce the following no-solicitation restrictions contained in an employment contract with a former tax manager and CPA: an 18-month prohibition on servicing clients whom the employee serviced at any time during the 18-month period before his termination from employment; and a 12-month prohibition on soliciting accounting services from any client of the Arthur Anderson office… [read post]
7 May 2009, 9:55 am
In Arthur Anderson LLP v. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 6:10 pm
In a recent case against accounting firm Arthur Anderson LLP, the Court stated that California employers cannot by contract prevent former employees from engaging in their profession, trade or business, unless the contract falls within one of the specific statutory or judicially created exceptions. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 5:00 am
Arthur Anderson LLP, which generally disapproved of a narrow-restraint exception to Section 16600. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 4:54 pm
Arthur Anderson required that there be a nexus between the defendant’s conduct and a foreseeable particular proceeding. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 6:22 pm
Arthur Anderson LLP v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 12:05 pm
Arthur Andersen LLP, 44 Cal. 4th 937 (2008) and held that customer non-solicits were unenforceable, it noted that Edward’s agreement likewise contained an employee non-solicit, but since Edwards did not dispute that portion of the agreement or contend that it was unenforceable, it did not address the employee-non-solicit in its holding. [read post]
6 May 2009, 8:50 am
At issue in Arthur Anderson LLP v Carlisle was a tax shelter scheme gone bust, which in turn generated suits by individual investors who had put money into the tax shelters against the advisors and lawyers who recommended the illegal schemes. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 5:00 am
Supreme Court decision Arthur Anderson LLP v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 7:37 am
In Edwards v Arthur Anderson LLP (2008), the Cal. [read post]
