Search for: "B & B Roofing & Construction" Results 1 - 20 of 289
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2016, 2:55 am
So, this popular material was used in a wide range of products such as ceiling and floor tiles, roofing materials or home insulation. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 7:23 am by Charles B. Jimerson, Esq.
According to section 489.113(4)(b) of the Florida Statutes, local construction regulation boards can deny, suspend, or revoke a certified contractor’s permitting privileges, if a local board finds, through the public hearing process, that a roofing contractor committed fraud or a willful building code violation. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 7:23 am by Charles B. Jimerson, Esq.
According to section 489.113(4)(b) of the Florida Statutes, local construction regulation boards can deny, suspend, or revoke a certified contractor’s permitting privileges, if a local board finds, through the public hearing process, that a roofing contractor committed fraud or a willful building code violation. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 5:25 pm
OSHA's new directive requires that all residential construction employers comply with 29 Code of Federal Regulations 1926.501(b)(13), which will no longer allow certain employers to use alternative methods of fall protection in lieu of conventional fall protection. [read post]
10 May 2022, 2:25 pm by Don Asher
General Fall Hazard Protections Guardrail Systems – 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(2)(i) Safety Net Systems – 29 CFR 1926.502(c) Personal Fall Arrest Systems – 29 CFR 1926.502(d) Warning Line Systems – 29 CFR 1926.502(f) Controlled Access Zones – 29 CFR 1926.502(g) Safety Monitoring Systems – 29 CFR 1926.502(h) Specific Fall Hazard Protections Leading Edges – 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(2) Hoist Areas – 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(3) Holes – 29 CFR… [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 6:29 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Children working on construction sites are six times as likely to be killed as minors doing other work, according to the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 10:30 am by David Headrick
The trial court held that the employee was employed by Neeley and that Neeley was a subcontractor of B & L Construction. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 10:30 am by David Headrick
The trial court held that the employee was employed by Neeley and that Neeley was a subcontractor of B & L Construction. [read post]