Search for: "B Kissel" Results 1 - 20 of 32
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2009, 1:56 pm by Wendy Hickok Robinson
Please join the New Orleans Chapter of the Federal Bar Association on Thursday May 14, 2009, from 2:00 to 4:00 for an interesting and timely discussion of ethics and professionalism with speaker Professor David Wilkins, Lester Kissel Professor of Law, Harvard Law School. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 12:44 pm by qbaron
Kissell Dean Andrew Guzman named USC provost and senior vice president for academic affairs [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Federal judge in Buffalo “dismisses EEOC’s largest pending pattern or practice lawsuit for failure to investigate” [Gerald Maatman, Jr. and Jennifer Riley, Seyfarth Shaw] U.S. magistrate judge in North Carolina orders sanctions against agency in lawsuit against law firm Womble Carlyle [Mary Kissel, WSJ] Commission’s campaign against employer use of criminal background checks meets resistance from nine state attorneys general [Penelope Phillips, Minnesota Employment… [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 8:23 am by June Casey
Wednesday, April 20, 2016 at noon, with lunchHarvard Law School Room WCC 2019 Milstein West A/B (Directions)1585 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge                       Professor David B. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 6:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 Sapienza v Becker & Poliakoff  2019 NY Slip Op 05218 Decided on June 27, 2019 Appellate Division, First Department is an example: “Plaintiff’s fraud claim was properly dismissed, as plaintiff did not allege “actual pecuniary loss sustained” by plaintiff’s decedent individually “as the direct result of” defendants’ alleged fraud (Lama Holding Co. v Smith Barney, 88 NY2d 413, 421 [1996] [internal quotation marks omitted]),… [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 6:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 Sapienza v Becker & Poliakoff  2019 NY Slip Op 05218 Decided on June 27, 2019 Appellate Division, First Department is an example: “Plaintiff’s fraud claim was properly dismissed, as plaintiff did not allege “actual pecuniary loss sustained” by plaintiff’s decedent individually “as the direct result of” defendants’ alleged fraud (Lama Holding Co. v Smith Barney, 88 NY2d 413, 421 [1996] [internal quotation marks omitted]),… [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 3:15 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
., 35 NY3d 173, 178 [2020]; Eurycleia Partners, LP v Seward & Kissel, LLP, 12 NY3d 553, 559 [2009]; CPLR 3016 [b]). [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 4:13 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
While incontrovertible proof of fraud is not required at the pleading stage, CPLR 3016[b] mandates particularity such that elementary facts from which misconduct may be inferred must be stated (see Eurycleia Partners, LP v Seward & Kissel, LLP, supra). [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 3:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
A claim rooted in fraud must be pleaded with the requisite particularity under CPLR 3016 (b)’ ” (Shahid v Ridgewood Bushwick Senior Citizens Council, Inc., 181 AD3d 744, 745 [2020], quoting Eurycleia Partners, LP v Seward & Kissel, LLP, 12 NY3d 553, 559 [2009]). [read post]