Search for: "B. MARSH" Results 1 - 20 of 283
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2024, 7:30 pm by Ben Allen
The District Court denied his motion, and Marsh proceeded to trial, where a jury convicted him of six of the seven charged listed in his Indictment.Prior to his sentencing, Marsh objected to three enhancements in his PSR, which increased his based offense level by 10: (a)  (1) a § 2K2.1(b)(1)(B) enhancement because the offense involved between eight and twenty-four firearms; (2) a § 2K2.1(b)(4)(A) enhancement because the offense involved… [read post]
25 May 2016, 12:00 pm
"Earlier this week, the Kat received an email from Chief Master Marsh in the Chancery Division who stated that all was not to be feared. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 2:59 am
A criminal Information charged Marsh with having obtained confidential client information from his employer, which is characterized in Department of Justice press releases only as "a multinational investment b... [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 5:45 am
  Marsh’s initial motion for certification was denied because she failed to show that her causes of action under California law on behalf of a nationwide class met the Rule 23(b)(3) predominance requirement. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 10:38 am by Maritime Law Staff
They collected at three times: • Once in early May before oil had reached shore • Once in late June when the marshes were fouled • Once in late August when oil was no longer visible The researchers found that exposure to BP’s crude oil caused the same kind of changes in gene expression in adult killifish from the marshes as in killifish embryos exposed to contaminated water samples in the lab. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 6:49 am
 §§ 18–6–403(3)(b.5), (5)(b)(II); 18–7–405.5, Colorado Revised Statutes (2016).Marsh v. [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 8:12 am by Jonathan H. Adler
 Interestingly enough, however, in each of the last two years more students have chosen to address Marsh v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 6:08 am
In their treatise on securities regulation, [1] Professors Jennings and Marsh concluded: “Judging solely from the facts stated in the opinions in the decided cases, the function of Section 16(b) would appear to be to impose unjust liability upon entirely innocent persons. [read post]