Search for: "BARRETT et al v. THOMAS et al" Results 1 - 20 of 28
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2022, 11:49 am by Eric Goldman
Amicus brief in support of Texas from Babylon Bee et al Amicus briefs in support of NetChoice/CCIA preliminary injunction motion Chamber of Progress et al EFF RCFP et al TechFreedom Texas response. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 10:58 am by Josh Blackman
Randolph, et al. for leave to intervene as respondents are dismissed as moot. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 2:56 pm
Wisconsin Right to Life (No. 06-969) and McCain, et al., v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 9:25 am by Josh Blackman
In any event, Roberts and (possibly) Kavanaugh are not on the same page as Rehnquist, et al. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Today’s justices make generous use of legal canons—those old principles of interpretation that come from Roman law and are often, perhaps surprisingly, shared with Islamic law.[15]After Karl Llewelyn excoriated the use of these legal canons to interpret statutes as incoherent over half a century ago, Justice Scalia and his textualist colleagues (and disciples) rehabilitated them.[16]They are now favored tools for Justices Barrett, Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, Alito, Roberts, and… [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 7:20 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
First up will be the ACA's defenders, the intervenor states (California, et al.) and the House of Representatives, followed by the Solicitor General and the plaintiffs. [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 3:43 am by Tobias Thienel
Stig Strömholm, ‘The Tension between Human Rights and Responsibilities’, Juridical Review (2004), pp. 13, 15; see also R (Al-Rawi & Ors) v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 7:56 pm by Josh Blackman
Justice Kagan wrote the majority opinion, joined by the Chief Justice and Justices Thomas, Sotomayor, Barrett, and Jackson. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 1:40 pm by Adam C. Ragan
The result was a hodgepodge of conflicting opinions and at least four main treatments described by then-Judge Barrett in Gadelhak v. [read post]