Search for: "BRYAN v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE" Results 1 - 20 of 94
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2007, 11:23 pm
State Department and Department of Justice have filed an amicus brief in the pending 6th Circuit appeal in O'Bryan v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  Bryan is one of the attorneys of record for CELA in this case. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 10:59 am by Margaret Wood
United States, 533 U.S. 27 (2001), Justice Scalia applied the rule first formulated in Katz v. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 1:38 pm by Julia Malleck
Department of Justice officially dismissed their appeal of case Whistleblower 21276-13W and 21277-13W v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 1:58 pm by Peter Margulies
As Justice Antonin Scalia noted in RadLAX Gateway Hotel, LLC v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Off the top, I can recall several others: Oliver North did it in 1987 during the Iran-Contra investigation; Webster Hubbell refused to testify during the Whitewater investigation relating to the Clintons; Monica Goodling refused to testify about the Bush/Cheney Justice Department’s hiring and firing of U.S. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 8:14 am by Peter Margulies
Justice Sonia Sotomayor dissented from the stay, joined by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
Bryan, World Peace: A Written Debate between William Howard Taft and William Jennings Bryan (1917) James F. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 5:41 am by Rachel Sachs
At Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen links to the briefs filed by seven states and by former Department of Justice Officials as amici in Shelby County v. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 5:01 am by Garrett Hinck, Matthew Kahn
Susan Hennessey and Wittes shared their column from Lawfare@FP, noting Jeff Sessions’s extraordinary failure to address how the Justice Department’s preparations for future election interference operations. [read post]
10 May 2019, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse weighs in on Department of Commerce v. [read post]