Search for: "Bailey v. USA" Results 1 - 20 of 59
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2014, 7:15 am by Lyle Denniston
Among the cases denied review on Monday was another sequel: Bailey v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 11:03 am by Kevin LaCroix
In the following guest, Yaminah Williams, Assistant Vice President, Hiscox USA, Alicia Garcia, Claims Counsel, Hiscox USA, Katherine Hausmann, Senior Complex Claims Specialist, Hiscox USA, Elan Kandel, Member, Bailey Cavalieri LLC and James Talbert, Associate, Bailey Cavalieri LLC, review the key 2001 D&O insurance coverage decisions. [read post]
16 Jun 2007, 3:51 am
OpinionPub DateShort Title/District 07a0215p.06  2007/06/11 USA v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 3:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
., Claims Counsel, Hiscox USA; Elan Kandel, Esq., Bailey Cavalieri; and Jennifer Lewis, Esq., Bailey Cavalieri, the authors make it clear that 2018 was also a very eventful year for important D&O insurance coverage decisions. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 9:34 am
George Christian, Janet Nocek, Barbara Bailey and Peter Chase — employees or officers of Library Connection, a consortium of libraries in Connecticut — were plaintiffs in Doe v. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 9:34 am
George Christian, Janet Nocek, Barbara Bailey and Peter Chase — employees or officers of Library Connection, a consortium of libraries in Connecticut — were plaintiffs in Doe v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 2:38 pm by Kevin LaCroix
., Senior Claim Counsel, Hiscox USA, Elan Kandel, Esq. and Jennifer Lewis, Esq. of Bailey Cavalieri take a look at the key D&O insurance coverage decisions of 2017. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 6:38 pm by Michael Stevens
Bailey     Eastern District of Kentucky at Covington 09a0022p.06  Dennis Pennington v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 6:38 pm by Michael Stevens
Bailey     Eastern District of Kentucky at Covington 09a0022p.06  Dennis Pennington v. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 4:47 pm
Finding that none of defendant's claims have merit, we affirm the the district court's judgment. 08a0012p.06 USA v. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 10:11 am
For the reasons set forth below, we AFFIRM the judgment of the BIA. 07a0434p.06 USA v. [read post]