Search for: "Bank of America NT&SA"
Results 1 - 10
of 10
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2009, 10:16 am
Bank of America, NT & SA, ___ Cal.4th ___ (Jun. 1, 2009). [read post]
21 Nov 2006, 6:00 am
Bank of America, NT & SA, ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Nov. 20, 2006), a judgment following a jury trial in a certified class action, with compensatory damages and penalties exceeding $1 billion, was reversed, wholesale. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 5:00 am
Bank of America, NT & SA, 46 Cal.4th 630 (2009) ("Miller I") (discussed in this blog post), in which the Supreme Court affirmed reversal of a $284 million judgment for damages and restitution under the UCL and CLRA. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 6:00 am
Bank of America, NT & SA, 144 Cal.App.4th 1301 (2006). [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 8:51 am
Bank of America, NT and SA, the Court held that Bank of America could setoff overdraft fees and fees for insufficient funds "(NSF") charged to a checking account with funds in the account, regardless of whether those funds came from public benefits. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 10:00 pm
Bank of America NT&SA (S149178). [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 4:50 am
Bank of America, NT & SA, ___ Cal.4th ___, 94 Cal.Rptr.3d 31 (Cal. 2009) [Slip Opn., at 4, 5]. [read post]
7 May 2008, 3:15 am
Bank of America, NT & SA, 144 Cal. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 10:03 am
Bank of America, NT & SA, 144 Cal.App.4th 1301 (2006) April 8, 2009, 9:00 a.m.: Amalgamated Transit Union v. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 10:00 am
The issue of positive rights has been the darling of a certain clique within the legal and political academic (mostly but nt entirely) communities certainly since the pathmaking jurisprudence of the German Federal Constitutional Court (and then others) appeared to suggest its rationalization within domestic constitutional orders. [read post]
