Search for: "Banks v. State of South Carolina, The"
Results 1 - 20
of 254
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2024, 12:48 pm
In Troxel v. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 12:48 pm
In Troxel v. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 4:57 am
Accordingly, we limit the holdings of Hook, Harvey, and Banks to the extent that they indicate that our State recognizes medical battery and hold that no independent cause of action for medical battery exists in South Carolina. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 5:03 am
” I get a similar response whenever I discuss South Carolina’s alimony structure with out-of-state counsel. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 12:18 pm
BNC Bancorp v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 10:02 am
Not only that, but it refused to acknowledge the ruling by the South Carolina Supreme Court in 2009 in All Saints Waccamaw Parish v. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 6:34 pm
For the US Supreme Court, the jumbled South Carolina opinions were "ambiguous" and "difficult to discern", but in the South Carolina Circuit Court, just one day later, all was suddenly "clear. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 1:20 pm
For the US Supreme Court, the jumbled South Carolina opinions were "ambiguous" and "difficult to discern", but in the South Carolina Circuit Court, just one day later, all was suddenly "clear. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 4:00 pm
She moved from South Carolina to California. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 2:02 pm
" FC North announced on June 10th a merger transaction with First Citizens Bancorporation, Inc., a separate bank holding company incorporated and based in South Carolina ("FC South" to the Court). [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 8:38 am
KabrawalaThe South Carolina Supreme Court’s ruling in Matrix Financial Services Corp v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:09 am
Cooper v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 2:25 pm
This case came to trial against the background of the South Carolina Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in All Saints Waccamaw Parish v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 6:26 am
Since then, the complaint was amended twice, and a number of states – Alabama, Georgia, Kansas, Michigan, Montana, Nebraska, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Texas, and West Virginia – joined the case as parties plaintiff and added some refinements to the original causes of action. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 6:51 am
Not every class action court filing in North and South Carolina becomes a full-length post on our blog. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 9:48 am
In filing the complaint, the CFPB was joined by the South Carolina Department of Consumer Affairs (SCDCA) and the Arkansas Attorney General. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 10:36 pm
Bowen v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 1:13 pm
Johnell Porter appealed his convictions for a list of crimes in relation to a robbery committed in York County (The State v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 4:00 am
In September 2012, an amended complaint was filed adding as plaintiffs the Republican state Attorneys General of Oklahoma, South Carolina and Michigan.) [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 1:54 am
" The Court of Appeals then cited the South Carolina Supreme Court's decision in South Carolina National Bank v. [read post]
