Search for: "Barnett v. Bank of America N.A., N/F Home Loans et al" Results 1 - 3 of 3
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Why should debt-buyers such as Midland Funding benefit from NBA protection when they are not national banks and are not subject to supervision and regulation as national banks?
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am by Wolfgang Demino
Available at: http://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview/vol92/iss2/12 Madden v Midland involved debt that was not only in delinquent, but already charged off by the original creditor (FIA Card Services p/k/a Bank of America, N.A.). [read post]
Texas Debt Suit Defense 101 - http://debt-suit-litigation-in-texas.blogspot.com
Why should junk debt buyers such as Midland Funding benefit from NBA protection when they are not national banks and are not subject to regulation and supervision as national banks?
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am by Wolfgang Demino
Available at: http://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview/vol92/iss2/12 Madden v Midland involved debt that was not only in delinquent, but already charged off by the original creditor (FIA Card Services p/k/a Bank of America, N.A.). [read post]
Texas Debt Suit Defense 101 - http://debt-suit-litigation-in-texas.blogspot.com
Other Circuits should follow the Second in Madden v Midland Funding and create national uniformity in protecting pre-crash victims of predatory lending (2017 Law Review article by Angel Rzeslawski) (paraphrased)
12 Dec 2017, 9:57 am by Wolfgang Demino
Hastings Law Journal has a new article (technically a "Note") on predatory lending and the implications of the Second Circuit's holding on federal (non)preemption of state usury laws in Saliha Madden v Midland Funding LLC et al, written by a recent graduate. [read post]
Texas Debt Suit Defense 101 - http://debt-suit-litigation-in-texas.blogspot.com