Search for: "Barry G. Silverman"
Results 1 - 20
of 32
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2015, 1:30 pm
"Ninth Circuit Judge Barry G. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 11:34 am
" So begins a dissenting opinion that Circuit Judge Barry G. [read post]
24 May 2016, 9:37 am
Barry G. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 3:28 pm
Judge Barry G. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 4:54 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit consisting of Chief Judge Alex Kozinski, Circuit Judge Barry G. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 9:48 am
District Court for the Southern District of New YorkKeynote Speaker: Stanley G. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 5:07 pm
In dissent, Judge Barry G. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 6:00 am
Silverman; Susan P. [read post]
3 May 2012, 2:37 pm
A dissent by Judge Barry Silverman and Judge Richard Tallman argues that the majority improperly ignores the plain wording of the statute. [read post]
22 Nov 2006, 5:45 pm
Thomas, Barry G. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 6:30 am
Clark, Barry A. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 1:04 am
Por su parte, el juez Barry G. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 7:31 am
Castro, 05-55665, (Opinion by Judge Tashima; Concurrence by Judge Silverman; Dissent by Chief Judge Kozinski (joined by Judges Fletcher and Wardlaw, and joined in part by Judges Thomas and McKeown; Dissent by Judge Thomas – all available here). [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 7:51 am
”However, Judge Barry G. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 10:50 am
Rymer, Barry G. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 1:18 pm
” A strong dissent by Judge Barry Silverman argued that this case has nothing to do with such innocent violations of employer policy, apparently suggesting that such conduct, although “unauthorized access,” would not fall under the CFAA because the required element of fraud is missing. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 3:30 am
Barry Sample Mr. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 11:42 am
Silverman and George K. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 3:41 pm
The en banc panel here consisted of eleven Circuit Judges: Alex Kozinski, Stephen Reinhardt, Pamela Ann Rymer, Barry G. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 3:16 pm
" In a powerful dissent, Judge Barry Silverman wrote: This case has nothing to do with playing sudoku, checking email, fibbing on dating sites, or any of the other activities that the majority rightly values. [read post]