Search for: "Barry Graber" Results 1 - 20 of 23
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2016, 7:43 am by Brian Leiter
...America is still doomed, for reasons aptly diagnosed by constitutional law scholar and historian Mark Graber: In 1964, the Republican Party made a fateful decision to “go hunting where the ducks are” in Barry Goldwater’s (in)famous words. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 5:42 am by David Markus
Circuit Court of Appeals Thursday in former Giants slugger Barry Bonds’ challenge to his obstruction of justice conviction in an investigation of steroids use. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 12:05 am
Graber Contributors: Akhil Reed Amar, Yale University * James H. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 3:37 pm
 Joined by Judges O'Scannlain, Graber, Callahan, and Nguyen. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 5:04 pm by Cal Law
The next person after Silverman in seniority is Judge Susan Graber, followed by Judge M. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 10:23 am by Randy Barnett
Historian Michael Vorenberg, political scientists Sonu Bedi, Mark Graber, Carson Holloway, Gary McDowell, Jeremy Rabkin, George Thomas, and Keith Whittington, economist Thomas Leonard, and philosopher Tara Smith have also discussed their recent books, as has journalist Damon Root. [read post]
1 Jan 2007, 11:03 am
Constitutions, Graber explains, often are compromises with the devil. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 6:08 am by Ken Kersch
Barry Goldwater, of course, assumed the leadership of the Party’s (constitutional) conservative wing, followed (more moderately, it seems) by Ronald Reagan. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 4:29 pm by Lawrence Solum
IntroductionThe counter-majoritarian difficulty may be the best known problem in constitutional theory. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 1:42 pm by Lawrence Solum
Introduction The counter-majoritarian difficulty may be the best known problem in constitutional theory. [read post]
22 May 2011, 2:36 pm by Lawrence Solum
Introduction The counter-majoritarian difficulty may be the best known problem in constitutional theory. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
FDR succeeded in that respect (even if Barry Cushman’s no-switch analysis of Justice Roberts is correct). [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 8:40 am by Randy E. Barnett
Offer my heartfelt thanks to all these authors for trekking to DC to discuss their books with my students. 2019: Neal Devins, The Company They Keep: How Partisan Divisions Came to the Supreme Court (2019) Larry Lessig, Fidelity & Constraint: How the Supreme Court Has Read the American Constitution (2019) Jonathan Gienapp, The Second Creation: Fixing the American Constitution in the Founding Era (2018) Rebecca Zietlow, The Forgotten Emancipator: James Mitchell Ashley and the Ideological Origins… [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 2:29 pm by Randy E. Barnett
Fritz, American Sovereigns (Cambridge, 2007) Timothy Sandefur, The Right to Earn a Living (Cato Institute, 2010) Sonu Bedi, Rejecting Rights (Cambridge, 2009) Alison LaCroix, The Ideological Origins of American Federalism (Harvard, 2010) 2010: David Bernstein, Rehabilitating Lochner (Chicago 2011) (assigned ms) Brian Tamanaha, The Formalist-Realist Divide: The Role of Politics in Judging (Princeton, 2009) Earl Maltz, Slavery and the Supreme Court, 1825-1861 (Kansas, 2009) Michael Vorenberg, Final… [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 8:17 am by Sanford Levinson
  This is certainly the theme of recent overviews of the Court written by such scholars as Barry Friedman, Michael Klarman, or Lucas Powe, not to mention Mark Graber’s classic demonstration of the way that the Court has often accepted invitations given it by ostensible majoritarian political parties to decide political hot potatoes whose legislative resolution would simply be too risky. [read post]