Search for: "Basis International Ltd." Results 1 - 20 of 1,808
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2014, 3:44 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang LLP
    [1] International Energy Group Limited v Zurich Insurance plc UK [2012] EWHC 69 (Comm) [2] Barker v Corus UK Ltd [2006] UKHL 20 [3] International Energy Group Ltd v Zurich Insurance plc UK [2013] EWCA Civ 39 [4] BAI (Run off) Ltd (In Scheme of Arrangement) and others v Durham and others [2012] 1 WLR 867 [5] Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd [2002] UKHL 22 The post Case Preview: International Energy Group… [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 12:50 am by CMS
Overview On 17 January 2024, the Supreme Court handed down  judgment in Herculito Maritime Ltd & Ors v Gunvor International BV & Ors unanimously dismissing the appeal. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 2:50 am by tracey
Merchant International Co Ltd v Natsionalna Aktsionerna Kompaniia Naftogaz Ukrainy: [2012] EWCA Civ 196;  [2012] WLR (D)  51 “An English court was entitled to consider whether a foreign judgment obtained in a Convention state had contravened the Human Rights Convention where there was strong factual evidence to rebut the presumption that the procedures of other Convention states complied with article 6. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 9:24 am
The latest issue of the International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law (Vol. 30, no. 1, 2015) is out. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 8:25 am by CMS
On 19 January 2022, the Supreme Court heard the appeal in Stanford International Bank Ltd (In Liquidation) v HSBC Bank Plc. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 6:57 am by CMS
The repercussions of the Fairchild enclave on insurance law (as first considered in Durham v BAI (Run Off) Ltd (2012) and in International Energy Group Ltd v Zurich Insurance Plc UK (2015)) are equally exceptional, and mean that any EL insurer of a liable insured employer during the relevant period of employment is liable to indemnify that insured in full, regardless of the period for which it has provided insurance and received premium. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:43 am by Stephanie Smith, Arden Chambers.
Its claim to be entitled to acquire the freeholds was challenged by the landlords on the basis that: a)     the properties were not “houses” because they, i. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 8:52 am by Lauren Wood, Olswang LLP
    [1] Tael One Partners Ltd v Morgan Stanley & Co International plc [2013] EWCA Civ 473,  para 29 [2] Ibid.,  para 37 [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 2:06 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
What mattered was the overall impression created by it, and that potential customers would appreciate it on the basis of its distinctiveness. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 2:47 pm
The Court of Appeal in Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation v IPCO (Nigeria) Ltd has reinforced the need for quick and effective enforcement of awards within the international arbitration system.A Nigerian domestic arbitration tribunal, in 2004, awarded $152 million in favour of IPCO Nigeria Ltd (IPCO) in proceedings against the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC). [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 1:58 am by CMS
In this case comment, Caitlin Heard and Natalie Coan, who both work within the intellectual property team at CMS, comment on the decisions handed down in the conjoined appeals of Unwired Planet International Ltd and another v Huawei Technologies (UK) Co Ltd and another; Huawei Technologies Co Ltd and another v Conversant Wireless Licensing SÁRL; and ZTE Corporation and another v Conversant Wireless Licensing SÁRL, all reported as [2020] UKSC 37. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 12:47 pm by Alex Gasser
No. 337-TA-730) terminating the investigation as to Respondents Mipo International Ltd. and Shenzhen Print Media Co., Ltd. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:02 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The appeal related to the loss occasioned in a re-financing situation, where a second loan had been advanced on the basis of a valuation that was assumed negligently made. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 10:06 am by Christopher Brown, Matrix.
Bloomsbury International Ltd v Sea Fish Industry Authority and DEFRA [2011] UKSC 25 has its origins in a claim brought by importers unhappy with the imposition of a levy. [read post]