Search for: "Battle v. Wright et al" Results 1 - 12 of 12
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2023, 2:32 am by centerforartlaw
The defendants asserted that the Supreme Court’s ruling in Dastar Corp. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 2:51 am
Under the Texas Supreme Court's 1969 opinion in Mandell & Wright v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 12:00 am
Many would conclude that Patton is to World War II and tank warfare what Napoleon was to the battle at Waterloo.Patton’s Name on the BoxThe most significant difference between Maximum’s use of Patton and EA’s use of Brown is that Patton’s name appears prominently on Maximum’s packaging. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 11:02 am
Many would conclude that Patton is to World War II and tank warfare what Napoleon was to the battle at Waterloo. [read post]
21 Feb 2021, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 16 and 18 February 2021 Julian Knowles J heard a PTR in the case of Wright v McCormack. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Skelos, et al., Respondents, vDavid Paterson, & c., et al., Appellants. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:56 am by centerforartlaw
Amidst the celebration of cultural remixing and transformative use, a paradox also emerges: the challenge of hypocrisy when artists who engage in appropriation themselves become embroiled in legal battles over copyright infringement. [read post]