Search for: "Beatrice M. Peters"
Results 1 - 11
of 11
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2021, 4:29 am
I think it was Peters and Hauser had a presentation. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 4:29 am
I think it was Peters and Hauser had a presentation. [read post]
26 Aug 2007, 9:48 pm
Of those, 24 incumbents have filed for re-election, 8 sitting judges have NOT filed as of yet, and there are five seats where new challengers have filed to run.The Incumbents who have filed for re-election (without any opposition) are:002 Barzee Flores, Mary004 Ward, Diane005 Donner, Amy Steele006 Esquiroz, Margarita009 Friedman, Ronald M.016 Firtel, Leon M.017 Trawick, Daryl E.023 Lopez, Peter R.027 Dresnick, Ronald033 Farina, Joseph P.037 Muir, Celeste Hardee044 Bagley,… [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 12:49 pm
Thu, Jun 06 2013 12:08:46 ReplyRetweetFavorite Beatrice M. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 8:25 am
Peter H. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 2:48 am
Bignami, Professor of Law, Duke University School of Law Panelists:--Lucy Dalglish, Executive Director, The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press--Peter M. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 8:23 am
J. 36 *** Peter S. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 12:05 pm
No promise about whether we’ll find a Beatrice to take you to Paradise. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 4:16 pm
(Thanks to Peter Lederer for the H/T). [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 3:46 am
Allie Spence & Horne Solicitors Michael Ashe Southwark Law Centre Abimbola Badejo 5 Pump Court Rebecca Bahar Cambridge House Christopher Balog Arden Chambers Samitra Balu Tyndallwoods Solicitors Frances Barratt South West Law (Legal Services in the Community) Ltd Justin Bates Arden Chambers Ian Beachley Moss Beachley Mullem & Coleman Sophie Bell Hodge Jones & Allen LLP Lucia Benyu Peters Legal Ann Bevington Fisher… [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 7:11 pm
Recently, two lawyers wrote an article in a legal trade magazine about excluding epidemiologic evidence in civil litigation.[1] The article was wildly wide of the mark, with several conceptual and practical errors.[2] For starters, the authors discussed Rule 702 as excluding epidemiologic studies and evidence, when the rule addresses the admissibility of expert witness opinion testimony. [read post]
