Search for: "Bell v. Children's Protective Services" Results 1 - 20 of 33
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2014, 3:37 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  It is considerably less absurd than the Hall majority's statement, "If the States were to have complete autonomy to define intellectual disability as they wished, the Court's decision in Atkins could become a nullity, and the Eighth Amendment's protection of human dignity would not become a reality. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 11:37 pm by Wolfgang Demino
  WHO ENJOYS PROTECTIONS OF BONA FIDE PURCHASER DOCTRINE? [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 4:15 pm by Reference Staff
The author is interviewed at PBS Books.'Poverty, By America' shows how the rest of us benefit by keeping others poorImmigrants and RefugeesNorthwest Immigrant Rights Project has provided legal services for nearly forty years. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 5:04 am by Susan Brenner
Monmouth-Ocean, supra (quoting Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 2:55 pm by MOTP
Ruth served as the Trustee until 2002, when, by judicial modification, she resigned, and the Trust was divided into four trusts of equal value, named after each of their four children.[1] Ruth is the sole beneficiary during her lifetime, and upon Ruth's death any remaining assets in the four trusts pass to the trust's namesake. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 6:45 am by Michael Geist
In addition to the large telecom companies, there have been requests to Plenty of Fish (an online dating site), Club Penguin (a childrens game site), Kik (an online messaging service), Yahoo.ca, and Contact Privacy (a site that protects the privacy of domain name registrants). [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 10:38 am
One more new case: ELLE BELLE cancellation for the mark registered for a variety of women's, men's, and children's clothes. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 4:29 am by Joel R. Brandes
The doctrine protects the status interests of a child in an already recognized and operative parent‑child relationship (Matter of Juanita A. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: European Court of Justice raises bar for famous brand owners wishing to prove dilution: Intel Corporation v CPM United Kingdom (Managing Intellectual Property) (IPKat) (IPKat) (Class 46) RPX Corporation – Defensive patent aggregation club (Securing Innovation) (Patent Fools) (Patent Prospector) (Techdirt) (IAM)… [read post]