Search for: "Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives"
Results 1 - 20
of 108
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2013, 9:04 am
Res. 5 provides:(A) The House authorizes the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the One Hundred Thirteenth Congress— (i) to act as successor in interest to the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the One Hundred Twelfth Congress with respect to civil actions in which it intervened in the One Hundred Twelfth Congress to defend the constitutionality of section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (1 U.S.C. 7) or… [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 4:56 pm
The Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group (BLAG) of the House of Representatives [official website] requested the motion [JURIST report]... [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 12:26 pm
Windsor to consider the constitutionality of DOMA, I flagged my exchange with Matthew Hall (Georgia) in Fordham Law Review over whether the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group (BLAG) had standing to represent the United States in the case (as well as whether the Prop 8 sponsors had standing to represent California in the same-sex marriage case). [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 1:20 pm
The House has an advisory group, bipartisan in makeup, to consider when the chamber will take legal action outside of the legislative process. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 4:20 am
New York Law Journal reports that on Monday, lawyers for the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the U.S. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 3:03 am
" The brief for the House Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group, by contrast, relies almost entirely on the stare decisis effect of High-Tech Gays and other Ninth Circuit precedents. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 7:22 am
In response, the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group (BLAG) of the House of Representatives voted to intervene in the litigation to defend §3’s constitutionality. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 6:07 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has posted online at this link the Brief of Intervenor-Appellant Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 1:47 pm
" The Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives (BLAG) argued that the third characteristic, that the group have a distinguishing characteristic, sometimes couched as "immutability," did not apply because sexual orientation is "not necessarily fixed," but can "range along a continuum. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 8:16 pm
Cali)Petition for certiorariBrief of respondent Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives in opposition (forthcoming)Brief of respondent Karen Golinski in support In association with Bloomberg Law [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
Because the Justice Department had made clear its intent not to defend DOMA in court challenges (even as it continues to enforce the terms of DOMA), an organization known as the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the House of Representatives (BLAG) sought to intervene as a defendant in the Windsor case in order to present a defense, on behalf of the DOMA and the House, to Windsor’s challenge. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 8:02 pm
House of Representatives in oppositionReply of petitioner Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 8:03 am
The Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group (BLAG) of the House of Representatives then intervened in the litigation to defend Section 3’s constitutionality. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 8:21 pm
The petition of the day is: Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 8:04 pm
The Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the U.S. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 4:56 am
Members of the House of Representatives, referred to as the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives (BLAG) intervened as a party defendant to defend DOMA. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 7:44 am
If the defendants in this case are to go to prison, it should not be at the behest of three members of the House's Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 11:54 am
Resigning from King & Spalding over the firm's decision to withdraw as counsel defending the DOMA, Paul Clement says the following: My resignation is ... prompted by the firm’s decision to withdraw as counsel for the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives in defense of Section III of the Defense of Marriage Act. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 6:23 pm
House of Representatives, through the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group (BLAG), defended the law instead. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 5:01 am
” 7Office of the United States Trade Representative, Administration Statement on the Protection of U.S. [read post]
