Search for: "Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Massachusetts, Inc."
Results 1 - 17
of 17
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
On June 1, 2005, after a jury trial lasting over three weeks, a jury found for Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts (“BCBS-MA”), Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota (“BCBS-MN”), Federated Mutual Insurance Company (“Federated”), and Health Care Service Corporation (“HCSC”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”) against Mylan… [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 8:48 am
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Massachusetts, Inc., 451 Mass. 389 (2008), the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court held that when the health insurance policy specifically defers payment to Med Pay coverage, then, after the initial $2,000.00 in PIP is exhausted, instead of your medical bills being submitted to your health insurance provider, Med Pay will kick in first and pay your medical bills. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 4:27 pm
Health Insurance Massachusetts: On June 8, the Division of Insurance issued Bulletin 2020-19 to Commercial Health Insurers, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Massachusetts, Inc., and Health Maintenance Organizations about the Division’s expectation regarding carrier flexibility in the administrative of early intervention services. [read post]
19 May 2020, 4:25 pm
Health Insurance Massachusetts: On May 18, Commissioner Anderson published Bulletin 2020-16, updating Bulletin 2020-02, regarding COVID-19 testing and the expectations of the Department to commercial health carriers, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Massachusetts, Inc. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 7:18 am
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts, which basically reads as a mini-treatise on a number of interesting issues arising in ERISA litigation. [read post]
COVID-19 Daily Insurance Regulatory Updates To Keep You Informed During The Lockdown (July 20, 2020)
20 Jul 2020, 5:51 am
Massachusetts: On July 20, the Division of Insurance issued Bulletin 2020-24, applicable to insurance companies, health maintenance organizations, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Massachusetts, Inc., Fraternal Benefit societies and Workers’ Compensation Self-Insurance Groups. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 8:53 am
Blue Cross and Shield of Massachusetts, Highmark, Inc., AmeriHealth Caritas, Health Care Service Corp and Blue Shield of California have also announced that they will no longer provide coverage for power morcellator procedures for women unless the procedures and the doctors performing them are preapproved to do so. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 8:53 am
Blue Cross and Shield of Massachusetts, Highmark, Inc., AmeriHealth Caritas, Health Care Service Corp and Blue Shield of California have also announced that they will no longer provide coverage for power morcellator procedures for women unless the procedures and the doctors performing them are preapproved to do so. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 6:25 pm
Healthnow New York Inc. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 8:12 am
” The case arose when Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. directed its third-party administrator, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts, Inc., not to report to Vermont’s all-payer database. [read post]
26 May 2023, 12:08 pm
Financial Life Insurance Co.13‐0231‐EXM In Re: Target Market Conduct Examination of United of Omaha Life Insurance Co.13‐0960‐EXM In Re: Market Conduct Examination of Agar Insurance Agency, Inc.13‐1020‐EXM In Re: Market Conduct Examination of Health Care Service Corporation14‐0412‐EXM In Re: Target Market Conduct Examination of Farmers Insurance Co., Inc.15‐0432‐EXM In Re: Market Conduct… [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 6:45 am
Massachusetts In Minuteman Health Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 8:51 am
484 Mass. 658 Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Norfolk.. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:00 pm
When Vermont sought to require the Plan’s third-party administrator, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts, Inc. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 10:37 am
” Massachusetts School of Law at Andover, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 2:52 pm
Supreme Court’s March 2018 entry of its opinion in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 2:52 pm
Supreme Court’s March 2018 entry of its opinion in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
