Search for: "Borg-Warner Inc" Results 1 - 20 of 25
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2008, 4:21 pm
(BER-L-9592-02), the verdict found Borg Warner, Inc., of Michigan, and Asbestos Corp. [read post]
9 Jun 2007, 2:26 pm
Defendants won four out of five cases that the Texas Supreme Court decided yesterday: Defense Wins Borg-Warner Corp. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 7:48 am by admin
Borg-Warner Morse Tec Inc., 12 Wash. [read post]
2 Nov 2013, 5:01 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Berns Air KingCorp., 525 F.2d 182, 185 (7th Cir. 1975) and citing Borg-Warner Corp. v.Paragon Gear Works, Inc., 355 F.2d 400, 404 (1st Cir. 1965)). [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 11:18 am
" Those customers include Toyota, Honda, Borg Warner, Allison Transmission, Cummins, Bobcat, Club Car, Johnson Controls, General Motors, Chrysler and Nissan.The payment of Vickers' prepetition claims is necessary, according to Grede, in order to avoid Vickers defaulting on its working capital line of credit from Bank of America, N.A. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 4:00 am
Vaughn Co.Judge Zagel1:07-cv-03339             Borg Warner Inc. et al. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:13 am by Jon L. Gelman
 "Plaintiff presented sufficient evidence to establish that Mark regularly worked in close proximity to asbestos-containing clutches, including those manufactured by Borg-Warner, to permit the issue of causation to go to the jury.Buttitta v Allied Signal, Inc. et al. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 11:56 am by Schachtman
Borg-Warner Corp., No. 13-cv-00675, 2015 WL 5166946 (W.D. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 11:43 pm
Chesterton Company Borg Warner Automotive Bell & Gossett Company Continental Can Company Flexitallic Gasket Company Garlock Sealing Technologies Federal-Mogul John Deere Industrial Equipment Company Goulds Pumps, Inc. [read post]
26 May 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The present appeal was directed against the decision of the Opposition Division (OD) revoking the opposed patent.The decision contains an interesting discussion of whether some of the documents cited against the patent were indeed available to the public before the priority date of the patent under consideration (1/9/99).It shows how hard it can be for an opponent to prove the existence of a prior public use/disclosure. *** Translated from the German ***[1.3.1] Document D2 is a product specification… [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 4:31 am by Broc Romanek
In addition, Time Warner, Genzyme, Bristol-Myers Squibb, International Paper, Pinnacle West Capital, and Liz Claiborne Inc. have filed similar no-action requests to exclude proposals with a 10 percent threshold, according to investors. [read post]