Search for: "Boroughs v. Social Security Administration"
Results 1 - 20
of 43
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2010, 5:05 am
LB Croydon v Shanahan [2010] EWCA Crim 98 Ms Shanahan was tried on three offences under section 111A(1A) of the Social Security Administration Act 1992. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 5:05 am
LB Croydon v Shanahan [2010] EWCA Crim 98 Ms Shanahan was tried on three offences under section 111A(1A) of the Social Security Administration Act 1992. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 1:36 am
Two HB decisions from the Upper Tribunal, Administrative Appeals Chamber have appeared, which are interesting because they demonstrate the approach of the Tribunal to the construction of the HB Regs (Torbay Borough Council v RF [2010] UKUT 7 (AAC) (14 January 2010)) and the Tribunal's approach to appeal grounds (HN v London Borough of Brent [2009] UKUT 289 (AAC) (11 December 2009)). [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 1:36 am
Two HB decisions from the Upper Tribunal, Administrative Appeals Chamber have appeared, which are interesting because they demonstrate the approach of the Tribunal to the construction of the HB Regs (Torbay Borough Council v RF [2010] UKUT 7 (AAC) (14 January 2010)) and the Tribunal's approach to appeal grounds (HN v London Borough of Brent [2009] UKUT 289 (AAC) (11 December 2009)). [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 9:14 am
Are nursing sled dog puppies sufficiently controlled if left at their mother's teat and the mother herself is securely tethered? [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 5:16 am
Barber v. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 5:16 am
Barber v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 5:35 am
As a secure tenant of the housing authority, this was in the form of a rent rebate, rather than a payment of a rent allowance, section 134(1A) of the Social Security Administration Act 1992. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:00 pm
In Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea v Bafna-Louis, 2023 WL 2387385 (S.D.N.Y., 2023) the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea (the “RBKC”) brought a petition for the return of CBL and Baby L to the United Kingdom pursuant to the Hague Convention. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 10:19 am
Denry Okpor v London Borough of Lewisham, Bromley County Court 25 October 2011 [Transcript not publicly available] Adam Wagner represented Mr Okpor in this case. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 1:23 pm
Jakimaviciute, R (On the Application Of) v Hammersmith And Fulham London Borough Council [2014] EWCA Civ 1438 Eligibility for allocation list, reasonable preference and homelessness. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 2:22 am
Decisions of interest involving Government and Administrative LawSource: Justia November 11, 2011 Farris v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 11:25 am
Idolo, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Bromley (2020) EWHC 860 (Admin) I’m a bit late to this one (ironically, as it turns out), it has been an open browser tab for ages, sorry. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 5:24 am
Rochdale Borough Council v Dixon [2011] EWCA Civ 1173Apologies for the late delivery of this case note which has been held up by a blizzard (of work rather than the kind afflicting the Eastern USA).This case is somewhat complicated and involved so you will have to bear with me. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 5:24 am
Rochdale Borough Council v Dixon [2011] EWCA Civ 1173Apologies for the late delivery of this case note which has been held up by a blizzard (of work rather than the kind afflicting the Eastern USA).This case is somewhat complicated and involved so you will have to bear with me. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 3:20 pm
Not unconstitutional, said the Second Circuit in X-Men Security, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 3:57 pm
Ibrahim v London Borough of Wandsworth [2013] EWCA Civ 20The question for the Court of Appeal in this second appeal from a homeless appeal, was “How should the courts deal with a plainly deficient homelessness decision when the deficiency has had no adverse consequences for the applicant? [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 3:57 pm
Ibrahim v London Borough of Wandsworth [2013] EWCA Civ 20The question for the Court of Appeal in this second appeal from a homeless appeal, was “How should the courts deal with a plainly deficient homelessness decision when the deficiency has had no adverse consequences for the applicant? [read post]
4 Jun 2023, 10:48 am
Coleman v Harrow LBC, 4 May 2023, Administrative Court, London, David Pittaway KC (unreported) This was a judicial review of Harrow’s failure to secure suitable accommodation under section 193(2) of the Housing Act 1996, another example of Elkundi in action. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:07 pm
There was also a judgmental decision as to how any such right was to be delivered, as the duty under section 193 was merely to secure that accommodation was available. [read post]
