Search for: "Brett L. Scott"
Results 1 - 20
of 67
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2013, 6:40 am
Scott Hemphill, Paying for Delay: Pharmaceutical Patent Settlement as a Regulatory Design Problem, 81 NYU L. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 7:07 am
Larkin (L&E Virginia) Scott M. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 7:55 am
Larkin (L&E Virginia) Scott M. [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 3:57 am
At Constitution Daily, Scott Bomboy highlights several high-profile cert petitions the justices considered at their conference on Monday. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 2:35 pm
Rev. 1991 (2007) 3 232 Frischman, Brett M.; Lemley, Mark A. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 3:28 am
For The New York Times, Scott Shane and others review Kavanaugh’s career, noting that “Kavanaugh is by legacy and experience a charter member of elite Washington. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 10:05 pm
Scott; Suk, JeannieLaw, Culture, and Economics of Fashion, The [article] 61 Stan. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:16 pm
Stromberg, Scott F. [read post]
19 Jun 2021, 3:37 pm
Berg is the James L. [read post]
21 Jul 2018, 9:04 am
Finally, Vladeck discussed Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s views on Morrison v. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 4:03 am
Township of Scott, Pennsylvania, which asks whether the court should reconsider a precedent that requires property owners to exhaust state remedies before bringing federal takings claims under the Constitution, comes from Miriam Siefter. [read post]
28 Jul 2018, 4:53 am
In L’Affaire Russe news, Victoria Clark, Mikhaila Fogel, and Matthew Kahn summarized a number of key takeaways from Mariia Butina’s July 18 detention hearing. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 11:34 am
Walker & Scott T. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 9:04 am
But as we later held in San Remo Hotel, L. [read post]
24 May 2014, 8:22 am
Scott Gemma M. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 12:21 pm
L. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 2:39 pm
L. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 10:39 am
Scott Crowder, vice president of IBM Quantum Computing. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 12:00 pm
Nat’l Security L. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 1:08 pm
If Brett Kavanaugh is not confirmed by the Senate, the Court would have only 8 Justices and be at risk of having some split (4-4) decisions. [read post]