Search for: "Brian B. Hayes" Results 1 - 20 of 40
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2011, 8:06 am by Seth Borden
 Chairman Mark Pearce and Member Craig Becker voted in favor of the changes and Member Brian Hayes voted against them. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 2:46 pm
Rev. 173 (2006/2007), Brian C. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 9:07 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
   The sole Republican board member, Brian Hayes, stated in his dissent that his colleagues had, “quite literally expanded the physical mass that unions may erect to confront and deter customers from entering a neutral employer’s premises[.] [read post]
27 May 2011, 8:11 pm by Jonathan L. Israel
Dissenting in both cases, Republican Member Brian Hayes decried the majority’s "re-definition" of Section 8(b)(4) that would allow a union to exploit the coercive and intimidating impact of the "rat collosi" in its secondary activities. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 4:17 pm by Seth Borden
  In Ampersand Publishing LLC d/b/a Santa Barbara News-Press, 357 NLRB No. 51 (Aug. 11, 2011), Chairman Wilma Liebman and Member Craig Becker, with Member Brian Hayes concurring on more limited grounds, rejected arguments that the employees’ actions were not protected because they dealt with editorial content rather than wages and benefits, and that the order would interfere with the publisher’s First Amendment right to control the newspaper’s… [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 5:56 pm
One of the other nominees (Brian Hayes or Mark Pearce) will get confirmed.Another option? [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 9:11 am by Franck Wobst
  Becker, Pearce, and a third candidate, Republican Brian Hayes, were first nominated by Obama to fill the three vacant positions on the five-member NLRB in July 2009. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 10:18 am by Mark Astarita
  The litigation against Crowe will be led by Alyssa Qualls and Dan Hayes of the Chicago office. [read post]
3 May 2012, 2:19 pm by Brennan W. Bolt
The new election rules were published on December 22, 2011, but Member Brian Hayes asserts that the Board's majority intentionally: breach[ed] the Board's internal operating rule and, for the first time in the history of this agency, [did not] allow the requisite time for preparing or circulating a dissent. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 4:59 am by Daniel Schwartz
NLRB member Brian Hayes dissented from the proposal and said that these proposal essential adopt organized labor’s goals: [B]y administrative fiat in lieu of Congressional action, the Board will impose organized labor’s much sought-after ‘quickie election’ option, a procedure under which elections will be held in 10 to 21 days from the filing of the petition. [read post]