Search for: "Bright v. IRS"
Results 1 - 20
of 83
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2023, 10:18 pm
From yesterday's opinion in Wayne Lee v. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 12:40 am
The post Filing IRS Form 2555 – A Guide for Expats appeared first on Bright! [read post]
2 May 2012, 4:00 am
The taxpayers in Alan Baer Revocable Trust v. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 7:28 am
They must also meet IRS criteria for living abroad to qualify. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 11:08 am
When deciding whether a bright-line rule like the one proposed by the IRS is beneficial, I'm not so sure a policy that favors innovation is necessarily a valuable one. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 2:10 pm
Bittner v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 2:04 pm
You author an opinion in a tax dispute and think that the IRS acted too late, so find in favor of the taxpayer. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 10:30 pm
Supreme Court decided South Dakota v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 7:00 am
Supreme Court overruled 50 years of precedent to eliminate the “physical presence” bright-line rule for substantial nexus in its South Dakota v. [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 9:00 pm
The case, known as Delaware v. [read post]
25 Aug 2019, 6:48 am
” In United States v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 6:07 am
[National Law Journal] * On the bright side, if you’re still looking for a job, our own David Lat has some advice on how to get one (and how NOT to get one). [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 8:01 am
Read more: FinCEN Form 114 Vs IRS Form 8938 – What Expats Need To Know How does the IRS enforce FATCA today? [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 12:51 pm
” By asking the IRS for clarity and bright lines in defining the prohibition, the charitable community emphasizes a key ex ante consideration, the impact of guidance on appropriate charitable behavior. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 8:26 am
Mathis v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 9:41 am
Miranda v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 7:14 am
Anderson v. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 3:31 pm
The Bright! [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 5:21 am
The substantial discretion of IRS agents under the IRM was also found to be inconsistent with the purpose of the means test to adopt a uniform, bright-line test that eliminates judicial discretion. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 8:39 am
’’ Earlier coverage of Wood v. [read post]
