Search for: "Brinker Connecticut Corporation"
Results 1 - 4
of 4
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2010, 8:56 am
The plaintiff claims that the postal service is an employer for purposes of § 31-310 because it is a public corporation geographically located within the state of Connecticut. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 12:27 am
Also, Daniel Schwartz continues his series of posts on employment law and the election with some insight on a potential Constitutional convention in Connecticut. [read post]
22 May 2012, 5:30 pm
Before we jump into the roundup, just want to point out some solid content over on LXBN: we have a roundtable recapping all the insight from LXBN authors on the NLRB “quickie” election rules being struck down and an LXBN TV with Francis Pileggi explaining how blogging changed the practice of corporate law. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 5:06 pm
Meal and rest break requirements clarified in Brinker v. [read post]
