Search for: "C Lillie" Results 1 - 20 of 436
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2008, 8:46 pm
The talks for a potential $70-a-share bid, which ImClone chairman Carl C. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 6:01 am
§ 135(c) (which relates to the filing of settlement agreements with the PTO in interference actions). [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 6:00 am
Practice Tip #2: An offer of confidential access to an ANDA "shall contain such restrictions as to persons entitled to access, and on the use and disposition of any information accessed, as would apply had a protective order been entered for the purpose of protecting trade secrets and other confidential business information." 21 USC § 355(c)(3)(D)(i). [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 9:00 pm by Laurent Teyssèdre
Actavis avait saisi les juridictions britanniques en déclaration de non contrefaçon au Royaume Uni, en France, en Italie et en Espagne, du brevet EP1313508 détenu par Eli Lilly. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
Here is the text of the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009: SECTION 1. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 2:58 am
Lilly counterclaimed that the divisional patent was invalid (Lilly v Genentech [2020] EWHC 261 (Pat)). [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 5:00 pm
By a vote of 61-36, the Senate has passed the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act (S. 181). [read post]
1 May 2017, 11:36 am by Howard Knopf
Oh, and by the way, Eli Lilly was now seeking damages in the amount of $500,000,000. [read post]
1 May 2017, 11:36 am by Howard Knopf
Oh, and by the way, Eli Lilly was now seeking damages in the amount of $500,000,000. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 1:55 pm
Indianapolis, Indiana - In conjunction with non-Indiana co-counsel, an Indiana patent attorney for Eli Lilly and Company, Eli Lilly Export S.A. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 12:01 pm
When a similar diabetes drug Victoza was introduced in 2010, a “black box” warning was placed on the label, alerting consumers and the medical community about a potential risk of developing thyroid C-cell tumors. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 8:59 pm by Dennis Crouch
For example, the Federal Circuit could-similar to DC Circuit Local Rule 28(a)(1)(C)-define a "related case" as including "any pending case involving at least one of the same parties and the same or similar issues. [read post]