Search for: "C Murphy" Results 1 - 20 of 1,138
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2020, 6:57 am by Daily Record Staff
In Case Number C-13-CR-18-000179, Murphy was indicted for armed assault, robbery, carjacking and kidnapping of Rinaldo Ayers (“Mr. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 3:22 am by Ben
So Ms Murphy herself could use the Greek service and her criminal conviction was overturned by the High Court.But neither CJEU nor the High Court directly resolved the wider issue of copyright infringement in those elements of the matches that could be protected by the Premier League - logos and graphics, the the league's anthem and pre-recorded and edited short films from earlier matches used in live broadcasts - and the CJEU noted that when these were shown in public - and… [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 8:34 am by Eric Goldman
Section 230(c)(2) Twitter explicitly didn’t rely on Section 230(c)(2)(A)–a bold concession that paid off. [read post]
15 Aug 2003, 11:56 am
Sequence of appeals: 1971 appeal dismissed by C of A. 1973 the Home Secretary referred the case of Murphy to the C of A who allowed his appeal. 1975 the Home Secretary referred the cases of Cooper and McMahon, but their appeals were dismissed. 1976 a second reference was again dismissed. 1978 the C of A declined to receive fresh evidence tendered by McMahon following a further reference by the Home Secretary. 1980 Cooper and McMahon were released from prison by… [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 6:00 am by Beth Graham
Murphy Oil USA, No. 16-307 (5th Cir., October 26, 2015), Epic Systems Corp. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 12:07 pm by Eric Goldman
Note how this move continues to collapse 230(c)(1) and 230(c)(2) by treating the filtered/removed content as third-party content. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 2:47 am by sally
Football Association Premier League Ltd and others v QC Leisure and others; Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd (Joined Cases C-403/08 and C-429/08); [2011] WLR (D) 286 “The clauses of an exclusive licence agreement concluded between a holder of intellectual property rights and a broadcaster constituted a restriction on competition prohibited by article 101FEU of the FEU Treaty where they obliged the broadcaster not to supply decoding devices enabling access to… [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 5:57 am by JA Hodnicki
Daniel Sokol Antitrust: Georgia Senior Statesmen Emmet J Bondurant(Bondurant, Mixson & Elmore, LLP) Band 1 Jeffrey Cashdan(King & Spalding LLP) H Stephen Harris Jr(Jones Day) Charles C Murphy Jr(Vaughan & Murphy) Band 2 Randall L Allen(Alston &... [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 2:13 pm
” His colleague Esiason piled on the mindlessness, saying Murphy should have insisted his wife “have a C-section before the season starts. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 2:36 pm by Media Law Prof
Enrico Bonadio, City University London, the City Law School, and Mauro Santo, M&R Europe, Intellectual Property Legal Advisors, Milan, have published 'Communication to the Public' in FAPL v QC Leisure and Murphy v Media Protection Services (C-403/08 and C-429/08) at... [read post]