Search for: "C. B. Epps"
Results 1 - 20
of 32
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2018, 4:34 am
” At The Atlantic, Garrett Epps looks at Jennings v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 6:07 am
B. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 8:00 pm
Berinsky, In Time of War Lynn C. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 10:29 am
McClean, Strategic Planning: As Simple as A, B, C (2015). [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 9:00 am
M-3
C., Robert . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 1:40 pm
(2) Self-dealing by corporate insiders, including: (a) Insider trading; (b) Kickbacks; (c) Backdating of executive stock options; (d) Misuse of corporate property for personal gain; and, (e) Individual tax violations related to self-dealing [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 2:23 pm
B. [read post]
29 May 2012, 6:36 am
En este último punto, concientizar sobre la correcta utilización y cuidados de los EPP, incluyendo una discusión sobre la importancia de los controles de ingeniería, higiene personal y las prácticas de trabajo para reducir la exposición. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 6:00 am
§ 1101(b)(3).)] [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 5:04 pm
For your taxes from A to Z, here’s the rest of the series: A is for Annual Contribution Limits B is for Bonus C is for Choate D is for Direct Deposit For the 2018 tax brackets and other numbers, check out this post. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 6:30 am
Docherty appealed on grounds that the Commencement Order was unlawful insofar as it preserved the power to sentence him to IPP, because: (a) to comply with ECHR, art 7, the international norm and principle of “lex mitior” (if, subsequent to the commission of the offence, provision is made for a lighter penalty, the offender shall benefit thereby) was binding, and the Court was obliged to impose an pre-2012 Act EPP; (b) if the principle of the 2012 Act was to remove IPP… [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 7:26 pm
Epps, 2010 U.S. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 6:25 am
§§ 1804(a)(7)(B) and 1823(a)(7)(B). [read post]
21 May 2014, 6:54 am
Epps 12. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 4:15 am
At Reason, Damon Root observes that although “[c]ommentators often refer to the U.S. [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:05 pm
Epps, 2011 U.S. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 2:36 pm
286 of the Local Government Act, R.S.B.C. 1996 c. 323: the prevention of prejudice to the defence of a government body. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 4:01 am
At The Atlantic, Garrett Epps writes that the case “may finally resolve the question of whether a citizen can ignore or even talk back to police officers without fear of consequences. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 4:26 am
” At PrawfsBlawg, Dan Epps explores “what the Court might or should do if it agrees … that the ban is, or soon will be, moot. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 6:05 am
C-SPAN will cover the hearing. [read post]
