Search for: "CAUSE OF ACTION v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al" Results 1 - 20 of 90
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2022, 4:13 am by Bernard Bell
  Such a showing of need might often be made in pursuing causes of actions that hinge on a government official’s motives for taking an action.[3]  And, of course, the required showing of need might turn on certain particulars of the analogous litigation. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 1:57 pm by Nikki Siesel
Phase 4 Films, Inc. et al, 2:13-cv-09401,  alleging trademark infringement and unfair competition. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 7:56 am by OTy9gYz
(c) Proceeds from the sale of consigned works covered by this section shall be deemed to be revenue from the sale of tangible goods and not revenue from the provision of services to the consignor or others, except that the provisions of this paragraph shall not apply to proceeds from the sale of consigned works sold at public auction. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 9:22 am by Gerald L. Maatman, Jr.
In terms of key decisions, there was no class action ruling in 2010 quite like Dukes, et al. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 11:58 am
The indictment charged Peters with making, and causing to be made and presented, false claims to the Internal Revenue Service in violation of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
 Pix Credit hereESG, has been driven by the private sector and intensely debated in the context of privately ordered responsible business conduct standards, and formed part of a rich debates among market actors and public international organizations about the role and nature of so-called non-financial siclosure in genmeral, and sustainability and climate related factors in decision making. [read post]
19 May 2022, 6:03 am by Kevin Kaufman
This analysis shows, however, that consumption does not disappear, and that revenue from taxes on tobacco products is rarely used to offset harm caused by that consumption. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 11:10 pm by Christa Culver
Gallagher et al.Petitioners' reply Amicus brief of International Municipal Lawyers Association Title: Williams v. [read post]