Search for: "CEMEX Materials LLC"
Results 1 - 20
of 20
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2011, 8:10 am
Cemex Construction Materials South, LLC. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 1:00 pm
The National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) issued a decision in Cemex Construction Materials Pacific, LLC announcing a new framework for determining when employers are required to bargain with unions without a representation election. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 6:56 am
As we recently discussed, the National Labor Relation Board’s (“NLRB”) monumental ruling in Cemex Construction Materials Pacific, LLC, 327 NLRB No. 130 (2023), is going to have a significant impact on the manner in which employers may respond to union organizing efforts. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 7:02 am
As recently discussed, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) issued a major decision this summer in Cemex Construction Materials Pacific, LLC, 372 NLRB No. 130 (2023). [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 1:29 pm
As we previously reported and discussed here, the Cemex Construction Materials Pacific, LLC ruling has dramatically changed the threshold that will prompt the National Labor Relation Board (“NLRB”) to issue mandatory bargaining orders and is going to have a significant impact on the manner in which employers may respond to union organizing efforts. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 6:10 am
The National Labor Relations Board issued a groundbreaking decision in Cemex Construction Materials Pacific, LLC that will likely leave employers reeling. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 4:45 am
On Friday, the National Labor Relations Board issued a decision in Cemex Construction Materials Pacific, LLC that it claims in this press release will “effectuate employees’ right to bargain through representatives of their choosing and improve the fairness and integrity of Board-conducted elections. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 4:45 pm
As foreshadowed by her August 2021 memo on Mandatory Submissions to Advice, in a brief filed in Cemex Construction Materials Pacific LLC, the Office of the NLRB General Counsel argued that the Board should reinstate an antiquated Board standard that was rejected more than 50 years (since 1969)—the Joy Silk doctrine—that would require employers to recognize and bargain with a union if it is presented with signed authorization cards from a majority of workers. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 5:02 am
On August 25, 2023, the Board released its decision in Cemex Construction Materials Pacific, LLC, 372 NLRB No. 130 (2023), which falls short of a complete revival of the Joy Silk doctrine, but overrules existing precedent and establishes an easier way for unions to establish representation. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 8:49 am
This was predicted in our prior article about the NLRB’s decision in Cemex Construction Materials Pacific, LLC, which established a new framework for the union representation process. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
Second, the Board issued a decision in Cemex Construction Materials Pacific, LLC, 372 NLRB No. 130 (August 25, 2023), which announced a new process when a union or employees believe that a majority of employees wish to be represented. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 7:45 am
Another notable statistic from FY2023 relates to the number of Certification of Representation (RM) petitions filed by employers after the NLRB’s August 25, 2023 decision in Cemex Construction Materials Pacific, LLC, 372 NLRB No. 130. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 2:12 pm
Materials Pac. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 2:36 pm
Materials Pac. [read post]
26 Nov 2022, 10:30 am
Materials Fla., LLC v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 4:33 pm
LLC, 669 F.3d 1362, 1365 (Fed. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 1:08 pm
In a brief filed in Cemex Construction Materials Pacific LLC, the General Counsel argued that the Board should forgo 50 years of precedent by reverting to the Joy Silk doctrine. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 10:01 am
Buschmann issued his decision April 10, 2007. *** Valley Health System, LLC d/b/a Desert Springs Hospital Medical Center (28-CA-20805, et al.; 352 NLRB No. 16) Las Vegas, NV Feb. 19, 2007. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 1:54 pm
Where an individual disseminates information he “understood to contain material untruths,” that individual has “employ[ed]” a “device,” “scheme,” and “artifice to defraud” within the meaning of subsection (a) of Rule 10b-5, Section 10(b), and Section 17(a)(1). [read post]
12 May 2015, 3:26 pm
., Inc. 90261J137 UBS Yield Optimization Notes with Contingent Protection linked to Apple, Inc. 90261J145 UBS Yield Optimization Notes with Contingent Protection linked to Adobe Systems, Inc. 902619824 UBS Yield Optimization Notes with Contingent Protection linked to Schlumberger, Ltd. 902619832 UBS Yield Optimization Notes with Contingent Protection linked to Corning Incorporated 902619840 UBS Yield Optimization Notes with Contingent Protection linked to Cisco Systems, Inc. 902619857 UBS Yield… [read post]
