Search for: "CHRISTOPHER V ARMY"
Results 1 - 20
of 100
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2007, 6:25 am
In Mary Doe SD v. [read post]
22 May 2008, 2:48 pm
Christopher Matthews, __ M.J. ___, No. [read post]
17 Jun 2017, 6:19 am
CAAF decided the Army case of United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 7:02 am
” In Christopher v. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 7:27 am
Army Colonel, was excluded from testifying as a government procurement expert. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 2:48 pm
The failure to do so may violate the principles set forth in Brady v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 1:01 pm
AndreIn Staub v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 10:58 am
Lonnquest, Chief, Office of History, US Army Corps of EngineersCharles A. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 2:27 am
Army Nat'l Guard, 794 F.2d 1034, 1036 (5th Cir.1986); Speigner v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 1:27 pm
See Sackett v. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 6:19 am
Climate Change Discourse in the United NationsTyler Jost, Kaine Meshkin, & Robert Schub, The Character and Origins of Military Attitudes on the Use of ForcePedro Seabra & Rafael Mesquita, Beyond Roll-Call Voting: Sponsorship Dynamics at the UN General AssemblyClara Egger & Doris Schopper, Organizations Involved in Humanitarian Action: Introducing a New Dataset Douglas M Gibler & Steven V Miller, An Appraisal of Project Mars and the Divided Armies ArgumentBryce W… [read post]
14 May 2012, 12:24 pm
By Christopher E. [read post]
5 May 2014, 5:10 am
After Christopher R. [read post]
20 May 2016, 8:39 am
Army soldier, Sergeant First Class Christopher Speer. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 5:01 am
The bulk of the report comes in Sections IV and V, which give detailed timelines of the events leading up to and during the Jan. 6 riot. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 7:57 pm
Laird emerged from an article published in the January 1970 issue of The Washington Monthly, titled "CONUS Intelligence: The Army Watches Civilian Politics," by Christopher H. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 2:26 pm
I will be speaking on the Supreme Court’s recent decision in US Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 5:50 am
The reasonable prospect of success standard articulated by Judge Christopher Greenwood has not been invoked, at least not explicitly, by other judges; still, the Court did appear to suggest in previous cases that a finding of plausibility should follow “a careful examination of the evidence and arguments presented” (see e.g., Costa Rica v. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 6:01 pm
Although the name "Christopher O Smith II" is reflected on the credit card account statement attached to the justice-court petition, the petition itself refers only to "Christopher O Smith. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 10:27 am
The Ontario Court of Appeal, in R v. [read post]
