Search for: "Cause of Action v. Department of Health and Human Services et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 95
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2018, 12:35 pm
July 27, 2018) (putative class action against the Director of the South Carolina Department of Health and Human Services alleging his decision to terminate Planned Parenthood’s status as a qualified Medicaid provider violates the Medicaid Act and the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 9:17 am
V. [read post]
2 May 2011, 10:08 am
Sherley, et al. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2012, 2:14 pm
Appeals -- Appellate court lacks jurisdiction of appeal of final judgment where no notice of appeal was filed within thirty days of date judgment was final and appealable -- Motion for supplemental final judgment was not an authorized and timely motion that would suspend rendition of final judgment -- Supplemental final judgment ruling on entitlement to attorney's fees is not final or appealable where amount to be awarded has not been determined
CATALINA HALNAT, LLC, et… [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 9:45 am
The MFHCA creates a new cause of action. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 9:10 pm
Obama, et al. (11-117); National Federation of Independent Business, et al., v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 8:16 am
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) funds on the basis of their objection, because of religious belief or moral conviction, to performing or participating in any lawful health service or research activity. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 12:07 pm
Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General and the Defense Criminal Investigative Service. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 9:42 pm
Scott Brain, et al., the U.S. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 2:13 am
Natural Resources Defense Council et al. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 8:18 pm
Although the tort of intimidation has long been recognized as giving rise to a cause of action, as affirmed in cases such as Tran v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 11:53 am
Genomic Health, Inc., et al. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Ville de Montréal (Service de police de la Ville de Montréal), 2018 QCCS 5639 [23] En raison de la position prise par la Ville de Montréal dès le début du dossier et de son comportement depuis, la présente demande en irrecevabilité est manifestement mal fondée, déraisonnable et abusive au sens de l’article 54 C.p.c.[11]. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 5:55 pm
District Court for the Eastern District of Texas issued a judgment and order in Texas Medical Association, et al. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 1:00 pm
The two settlements illustrate achievements for the Health Care Fraud Prevention and Enforcement Action Team initiative, announced in May 2009 by the Attorney General and the Secretary of Health and Human Services. [read post]
10 Nov 2012, 2:14 pm
CATALINA HALNAT, LLC, et al., Appellants, v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 7:43 am
Lake, et al., No. 12-6137, 2013 U.S. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 3:00 am
Independent Living Center, et al. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 9:55 pm
As such, if the proposed framewrok gains traction, it might have a significant effect on the shae and practive of sovereign lending (and borrowing), tax policies and related actions of governments (and their transnnational lenders). [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 9:54 am
This case is titled, United States ex rel Jones, et al., v. [read post]
