Search for: "Channel v. Commissioner of SSA" Results 1 - 3 of 3
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2007, 3:26 am
We now so hold: because Binder was not a party in the proceedings before the SSA, it cannot avail itself of section 405(g).Normally, Section 405(h) channels all challenges that "arise under" the Act through the proper administrative proceedings by forbidding federal suits that have not been administratively reviewed first. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 5:46 am by Marie Louise
Betar Jerusalem and Media 41 LTD (IP Factor) Serving papers in Palestinian Autonomy (IP Factor) Chinese Commissioner of Patents speaks in Tel Aviv (IP Factor) Italy Italy signs up for Singapore (Class 46) A pig’s ear: Soprèssa Vicentina PDO spec amended (Class 46) South Africa Slipping through the net: SA loses to fakers (Afro-IP) ‘You say vuvuzela, I say lepatata…’ (IPKat) Spain Priority in filing: does every minute count? [read post]