Search for: "Chi Mei Corporation"
Results 1 - 17
of 17
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Special Master: Vincent J. Poppiti: Discovery Dispute over Production of Worldwide Sales Information
5 May 2010, 9:33 am
Special Master Poppiti ordered defendant Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation to produce its worldwide sales data and technical information because such information is relevant to: "(i) inducing infringement liability; (ii) determining direct infringers; (iii) commercial success; and (iv) a reasonable royalty determination. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 12:36 pm
Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 4:11 pm
On August 23, 2010, Chimei Innolux Corporation of Taiwan, Chi Mei Optoelectronics U.S.A., Inc. of San Jose, California, and Innolux Corporation of Austin, Texas (collectively, “CMI”) filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 4:17 pm
In the Order, ALJ Essex granted a joint motion filed by Complainants Chimei Innolux Corporation, Chi Mei Optoelectronics U.S.A., Inc., and Innolux Corporation and Respondents Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation America, Sony Electronics, Inc., and Sony Computer Entertainment America, LLC to terminate the investigation based on a settlement agreement. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 6:00 am
The defendants named in the action are: AU Optronics Corporation; AU Optronics Corporation America, Inc.; Chi Mei Corporation; Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation; Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc.; CMO Japan Co., Ltd.; Hitachi Displays, Ltd.; Hitachi, Ltd.; Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc.; LG Display Co., Ltd.; LG Display America, Inc.; Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.; Samsung… [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:58 pm
The Respondents in this investigation are: Chimei Innolux Corporation, Innolux Corporation, Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc., MStar Semiconductor, Inc., Qisda Corporation, Qisda American Corporation, Qisda (Suzhou) Co., Ltd., BenQ Corporation, BenQ America Corp., BenQ Latin America, and Realtek Semiconductor Corporation. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 11:24 am
The investigation is based on an August 23, 2010 complaint and September 2 and 10 letters supplementing the complaint filed by Chimei Innolux Corporation of Taiwan, Chi Mei Optoelectronics U.S.A., Inc. of San Jose, California, and Innolux Corporation of Austin, Texas alleging violation of Section 337 in the importation into the U.S. and sale of certain liquid crystal display devices and products interoperable with the same that infringe certain claims of U.S. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 6:40 pm
According to the Notice of Investigation, the ITC has identified the following entities as respondents in this investigation: Chimei Innolux Corporation of Taiwan Innolux Corporation of Austin, Texas Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc. of San Jose, California MStar Semiconductor, Inc. of Taiwan Qisda Corporation of Taiwan Qisda American Corporation of Irvine, California Qisda (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. of China BenQ Corporation of Taiwan BenQ… [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 1:26 pm
(CR 09-247 SI); Epson Imaging Devices Corporation (CR 09-854 SI); and Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation (CR 09-1166 SI). [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 5:39 am
Wang, a resident of Taiwan and the former vice president of sales and marketing of Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation, is charged with participating in the conspiracy from at least as early as September 14, 2001, and continuing at least until December 1, 2006. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 5:39 am
Wang, a resident of Taiwan and the former vice president of sales and marketing of Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation, is charged with participating in the conspiracy from at least as early as September 14, 2001, and continuing at least until December 1, 2006. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 5:12 pm
The complaint alleges that Chimei Innolux Corporation of Taiwan, Innolux Corporation of Austin, Texas, Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc. of San Jose, California, and MStar Semiconductor, Inc. of Taiwan (collectively, the “Proposed Respondents”) through the manufacture, sale for importation, importation, and/or sale within the U.S. after importation of certain liquid crystal display devices, including monitors, televisions, and modules, and components… [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
(Afro-IP) Australia Major changes to Patents Act proposed; proposed changes anger Australian patent attorneys (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) (Managing Intellectual Property) IP examination centre in Melbourne to boost Australian innovation and jobs (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court: ‘Use it or lose it’ approach confirmed: E & J Gallo Winery v Lion Nathan (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Bulgaria M-Tel ‘best Bulgarian brand’ in independent… [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 1:00 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:00 am
Chennai Live 104.8 FM asks the Madras High Court: Indian Performing Rights Society Ltd & Ors v Branch Manager, Muthoot Finance Private Limited, Chennai & Ors (Spicy IP) Bombay High Court: Use of inventions for government purposes: Garware Wall Ropes v A I Chopra Engineers & Contractors, Konkan Railway Corporation (IP Frontline) Beware Mumbaikers: The Slumlord’s Act could detain you for a year for simply buying a pirated DVD (Spicy IP) (At Last... the 1709… [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 3:35 pm
The companies came to an agreement for use of the rig and Maersk USA and Statoil Gulf of Mexico LLC (Statoil), a Texas Corporation, signed a contract in Norway. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Securing Innovation) PriorSmart.com search tool, tracking patent documents (Competitive Info) (Patently-O) Patent damages as an incentive to transact (IP finance) IPscore, new patent evaluation toy (IP finance) Patent portfolios can pull companies out of financial rut (Law360) Global - Copyright Expanding the public domain: part zero (Creative Commons) Australia Pioneering decision on non-use: Pioneer Computers Australia Pty Limited v Pioneer KK (Australian Trade… [read post]
