Search for: "Chippendales USA, LLC"
Results 1 - 11
of 11
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Oct 2009, 8:07 am
Hot (if unlike LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION ® you go for that sort of thing) off the presses — here’s the appellate brief in the Chippendale’s appeal of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board’s affirmation of In re Chippendales USA, LLC, in which the PTO refused to register the “apparel configuration” shown at right for “adult”… [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 5:18 pm
: December 4, 2008 – 10 AM: In re Chippendales USA, LLC, Serial No. 78666598 [Refusal to register... [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 1:56 am
At his Likelihood of Confusion blog, Ron Coleman comments (here) on the pending TTAB appeal in In re Chippendales USA, LLC, Serial No. 78666598 [Appeal from the PTO's refusal to register the apparel configuration shown below for "adult entertainment services, namely exotic dancing for women in the nature of live performances" on the ground that the design is not inherently distinctive].The PTO has conceded that the Chippendale "outfit" is… [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 8:25 pm
: December 4, 2008 - 10 AM: In re Chippendales USA, LLC, Serial No. 78666598 [Refusal to register the apparel configuration shown below for "adult entertainment services, namely exotic dancing for women in the nature of live performances" on the ground that the design is not inherently distinctive]. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 4:14 pm
: December 4, 2008 – 10 AM: In re Chippendales USA, LLC, Serial No. 78666598 [Refusal to register the apparel configuration shown below for “adult entertainment services, namely exotic dancing for women in the nature of live performances” on the ground that the design is not inherently distinctive]. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 1:18 pm
: December 4, 2008 – 10 AM: In re Chippendales USA, LLC, Serial No. 78666598 [Refusal to register the apparel configuration shown below for “adult entertainment services, namely exotic dancing for women in the nature of live performances” on the ground that the design is not inherently distinctive]. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 11:10 pm
(IPKat) US Trade Marks – Decisions CAFC affirms TTAB: Chippendales’ ‘Cuffs & Collar’ mark not inherently distinctive: In re Chippendales USA, Inc (TTABlog) (Likelihood of Confusion) (Patently-O) 2nd Circuit: An invalid assignment isn’t incontestable: Federal Treasury Enter. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 12:00 pm
., Serial No. 76545104 [Section 2(d) refusal to register the mark shown below for textile fabric, textile goods, and clothing, in view of the registered marks FRANCO FERRARO for various clothing items, and FERRARI for clothing and textile goods].December 4, 2008 - 10 AM: In re Chippendales USA, LLC, Serial No. 78666598 [Refusal to register the apparel configuration shown below for "adult entertainment services, namely exotic dancing for women in the nature of live… [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 2:08 pm
In re Chippendales USA, Inc., 622 F.3d 1346, 1350 (Fed. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 3:00 pm
: Canadian voices on copyright law’ documentary produced by Michael Geist and Daniel Albahary (Michael Geist) (Coverage of the film – Michael Geist) (Techdirt) IP & the economy – never allow a crisis to go to waste (Excess Copyright) Sleeman Breweries files lawsuit against Dead Frog Brewery over Dead Frog’s use of clear glass bottle design (Canadian Trademark Blog) China Investigation orders in IP cases (China Hearsay) Negotiating with IP… [read post]
